Priority Mail Boxes to Shrink

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Mat, Oct 24, 2021.

  1. Mat

    Mat Ancient Coincoholic

    john65999 and jafo50 like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. scottishmoney

    scottishmoney Buh bye

    Quite a business model - reminds me of Eddie Lampbert buying up Sears and K-Mart and slowly but surely killing them by not updating, giving the customers less - turning the lights down, the air off in the summer etc. But Louis DeJoy is doing to an institution that goes back to the earliest days of American history. Slowing mail down, charging more and giving the customers less will kill it off quickly.
     
  4. Jim-P

    Jim-P Well-Known Member

    Free priority mail boxes was a great idea, I'm sure a lot of people opted for paying the premium shipping over Retail Ground because of the free box. But now that the cost differential between between the two is so small, I expect it won't be long before we see USPS charging for priority mail boxes.

    Wish they wouldn't insult the general public by claiming that the boxes are smaller because its more efficient.
     
    capthank and derkerlegand like this.
  5. Beardigger

    Beardigger Well-Known Member

    Most are being downsized by 1/4 " or less. except fpr the regional boxes (which few use anyway). The only Flat Rate Box being reduced is the Large one by 1/4". I really don't think many people will notice the difference. Looks like they are bringing coxes down to the 12" size for better automated processing.
     
    baseball21 and MIGuy like this.
  6. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Wish I'd picked up more of the full-size ones before this. Apparently they've been distributing the shrunken ones since the end of last month.

    "This item doesn't fit into the box" is pretty hard to miss.

    "Shipping on this will be an extra $10 because it doesn't fit into a standard box" is pretty hard to miss, too.

    I had some magazines I was thinking of selling, and it seemed like I'd found one of the flat-rate boxes that I could pack quite solidly with them. Guess I'll need to start over if I decide to complete that project.

    Now, if this is really about being able to process the smaller packages more efficiently, with less need for manual "sortation", then the new packages should ship for a lower price, right? I'm off to look for the press releases about the new reduced flat-rate shipping fees. :rolleyes:
     
  7. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    Political conservation, you know... Give us less, charge us more. Way to go!
     
    john65999 and Evan Saltis like this.
  8. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    It actually is though. Part of it is obviously to save money but it's not a lie.

    They should probably get rid of those or have them just for businesses. I don't think I've ever actually seen one be used
     
    ddddd likes this.
  9. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    Prices will never come down especially not when they're losing money from mail being reduced, airlines charging insane rates for cargo space, more drop shipping from more packages etc. Saving money should be a priority for them and just because that's one benefit doesn't mean the other cant be true as well
     
    ddddd likes this.
  10. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    The best hope (although still a stretch) is that all of these changes will save the post office enough money that they won't need a huge bailout. Using a slightly smaller box or paying a bit extra for each package will be a lot lower of an expense than the taxes needed out of your paycheck to make the post office solvent without any changes.

    We also have to remember that items like priority mail flat rate are the same price regardless of location. Mailing to place like Guam, Alaska, Hawaii, etc costs more than mailing to New York or LA.

    I'm not a fan of paying more but so far the changes are no where as drastic as they could be (and much tamer than other price increases we have been seeing throughout 2021).
     
    baseball21 likes this.
  11. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    That's a pretty poor comparison. Dejoy comes from a logistics background and has a task to make the USPS function more efficiently within government constraints. Lampert came from a hedge fund/investment background where stripping a company and turning a profit without any other consideration was the norm.
     
    baseball21 likes this.
  12. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    Agreed. It's not ideal but these changes were LONG overdue and it's nice to actually see the USPS being run competently for once. I have no idea how long the contracts last for but I hope that someone competent is in charge next time an Amazon or UPS/Fedex contract comes up for bid. The discounts they get are absolutely insane even for their volume.

    I still will never understand the logic of the drop shipping for UPS/Fedex either, you're doing the most expensive part for a competitor for pennies on the dollar. If you're going to do that you need to charge full price or close to it instead of helping them steal business.
     
    Last edited: Oct 24, 2021
    serafino and ddddd like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page