I don't think so, George. I think it would be unfair. It's just a little strike-doubling on a cent-issue that has a major doubled die error to its credit.
The 1955 poor man's doubled die is not a real doubled die. It is caused by die deterioration doubling. Actually the poor man is a group of several highly used dies.
THIS, is the real "poor man's doubled die" . . . . . . . https://groveminting.com/newmarket/...-die-overstrike-of-the-1955-lincoln-cent.html
Can't save the world . . . . . Can't even get them to pay attention to grammar . . . . . . (I'mma gonna get banned for this . . . . ) I'll just leave it a thumbnail. Click and open on your own. Z