Grading ANACS Grading of 1973-D Eisenhower Dollars part 6/20

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by cplradar, Jul 13, 2021.

?

MS62

Poll closed Jul 20, 2021.
  1. MS63

    29.4%
  2. MS64

    29.4%
  3. MS65

    41.2%
  4. MS66

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. MS67

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. MS68

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. cplradar

    cplradar Talmud Chuchum


    That is good because I don't want one... really. I am interested in the grade you would give, though, and the reason why.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    Wow, ANACS was more than fair on it's grade. I would have guessed lower. Lucky you! Thanks for sharing.
     
  4. Mac McDonald

    Mac McDonald Well-Known Member

    Think that's a sure clue that it didn't grade AU55 or anything of what's not provided, but rather something within that 63-68 range. I actually don't see any wear, but indeed see the obverse marks both larger and smaller...I sure didn't figure a 65.
     
    Scott J likes this.
  5. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

  6. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    I don’t see any wear, but a coin graded MS65 is expected to have booming luster. That’s why this IKE shouldn’t grade any higher than choice MS.
     
  7. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    ANACS graded coins don’t qualify anyways. NGC/PCGS only.
     
    ldhair likes this.
  8. RogerC

    RogerC Well-Known Member

    High magnification can be deceiving, shrink the pic down to actual and it looks much better.
     
    cplradar likes this.
  9. cplradar

    cplradar Talmud Chuchum


    especailly on clad ikes
     
  10. cplradar

    cplradar Talmud Chuchum

    <<ANACS graded coins don’t qualify anyways. NGC/PCGS only.>>

    That is not just WRONG, but it is also provocative and can be understood as insulting. It might be even litagatable if ANACS wanted to. Please don't troll on my threads. You can hijack someone else's thread to throw out misplaced anger.
     
    Last edited: Jul 19, 2021
  11. Hookman

    Hookman Well-Known Member

    I think he's talking about qualifying for the "Green Bean" , not qualifying for your thread, which if true, all he did was state a fact, not an opinion.
     
    charley and ldhair like this.
  12. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    That's my understanding as well.
     
  13. charley

    charley Well-Known Member

    Could that be made a little larger?

    Yikes.

    Yikes x 2.
     
    micbraun likes this.
  14. cplradar

    cplradar Talmud Chuchum


    100% - if he meant that, it wasn't clear, at least to me.
     
  15. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    Try going back and reading his post and the post he quoted and was replying to.
     
  16. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    Instead of calling me a troll, try to actually read my posts. If you don’t understand, just ask. I am here to share the thing or two I know about coins. Peace ;-)
     
  17. john65999

    john65999 Well-Known Member

    i was thing ms-64+ at most, ya got lucky i guess, lol ikes are tough
     
  18. cplradar

    cplradar Talmud Chuchum

  19. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

    They got one right!
     
  20. cplradar

    cplradar Talmud Chuchum

    label reg 7297651
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page