GTG: 1900 Morgan

Looks MS 64 to me, too.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

There is no way this should be graded 65 with the chin and the hit to the cheek

 

I am in at MS64.

 

I'm going 65. I have an ms66 with a worse hit to the cheek than that, though I wonder how it got the grade.

 

I say 65

 

MS66

 

Reveal time!

 

It’s a nice coin but I hope it wasn’t 65 money . They over graded this one.

 

Not really. Most say 64, and it came out 65. Well within range. Once again, don’t count the bagmarks on a Morgan to obtain a grade.

 

I got it wrong...again!

 

Ok I would not pay 65 money for it . Chin looks like it was hit with a cheese grader .

 

I was thinking the chin was wheel marks from the draw bench that didn't strike out.

 

It would be interesting to see in hand. Often marks like this are much worse in photos.

 

I think it's easily a $200 coin. I think MS65 on it isn't all that implausible.

 

True photos are hard to judge sometimes

 

Especially my photos.

 

It isa really nice coin. I said 64, but am not shocked at it being a 65. It had gemmy luster.

 

Beautiful coin right there!

 

and this is why I don't collect Morgans. I have zippo ability to grade them (at least from photos).

 

This is pure market grading BS,
For all you others that think standards have a meaning, I usher you to consider looking the other way for the rest of this conversation.