1886 IHC possible pitting?

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by AirborneReams, Jun 5, 2021.

  1. AirborneReams

    AirborneReams Supporter! Supporter

    Hello all,

    I have this 1886 IHC that looks okay on the reverse but the obverse looks very interesting. It weighs what it should, it almost looks like it’s pitting but not sure due to I don’t see much of any damage or anything it has it’s brown color still everywhere. I thought it was fake but why would anyone waste their time with this date. I thought when something was pitting there would be black and other corrosion, very strange.


    B63B47C6-DDDF-449E-B42A-D004BA9E487D.jpeg 6938BC49-C2B2-4C7E-B63A-663DC6E65C4C.jpeg 6709CBEB-1EFB-40E0-92F4-E0AEA60B2C97.jpeg
     
    OldSilverDollar likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

  4. AirborneReams

    AirborneReams Supporter! Supporter

    Why would someone alter the surface if it’s a decent grade?
     
    OldSilverDollar likes this.
  5. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    It happens all the time. Someone trying to get rid of a problem. Some of these were done by folks that thought baking soda was a safe way to treat a coin. The others are coin Doctors that alter a surface and sell it to an unknowing buyer.
     
  6. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    I have doubts that it is genuine. The border does not look right on both sides.

    As to why anyone would bother to fake in 1886 Indian Cent, it is actually a better date that is underrated. This was the year that the hubs were changed and there was an alteration in the relationship between the feathers and the legend on the obverse. The new hub often did not strike up well in 1886.

    When I was working on an Indian Cent set when I was in high school in the 1960s, this was the one date that I could not find in better than VG. Everything else in the set graded Fine or better.
     
  7. AirborneReams

    AirborneReams Supporter! Supporter

    Hmm I guess that’s true, he tricked me after all but the pictures did not show the coin well enough to determine that these issues were present.. thinking I should return it at this point.
     
    OldSilverDollar likes this.
  8. AirborneReams

    AirborneReams Supporter! Supporter

    I questions as well, the weight is where it needs to be but I know they have weight down or close to it. The letters throw me
    Off especially the S at the end of states.. yea it is a less common date I suppose since there is two variety’s for this year as you stated the die switch. Pretty cool piece just looks horrid if it is real ha ha.
     
    OldSilverDollar likes this.
  9. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    That coin is just not right, if you have the chance to return it I would.
     
  10. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    Return the coin if possible. I don't believe the coin is real. If I'm wrong it still has no value.
     
  11. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    It looks like someone applied a strong acid to that side. Why not to the other side? You'll have to ask him. Or her.
     
  12. AirborneReams

    AirborneReams Supporter! Supporter

    I will have to ask but I will be returning this piece either way. Not worth the 60$
     
    OldSilverDollar likes this.
  13. manny9655

    manny9655 Well-Known Member

    I also question that coin's authenticity. Look at the denticles on the obverse. They're much longer at 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock than they are at 12 and 6 o'clock, and that's not due to wear.
     
  14. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    Maybe the seller didn't do it. Maybe doesn't even know it's acid. I said you'll have to ask if you want to know because it's curious why the reverse isn't affected and we simply can't figure that out. But I've cents like this and I've seen cents like this and we're talking about the "smoking" kind, like hydrochloric or sulfuric acid. This is what those hot acids do to copper coins.
     
  15. AirborneReams

    AirborneReams Supporter! Supporter

    Yea I see that also, it’s just weird how the reverse looks fine makes me wonder if it was just a horrid clean job with something acidic as @eddiespin stated..
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page