What happened to Gitbud Numismatik?

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by tartanhill, May 12, 2021.

  1. tartanhill

    tartanhill Well-Known Member

    Is this what you need? 5873151-004
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Barry Murphy

    Barry Murphy Well-Known Member

    Unfortunately if i did and XFR test on this coin, I didn't save the results.

    This coin is part of a large influx of fake electrum that's been hitting the market the last few years. The punches tend to be the giveaways as they are pressed into the flan instead of being struck or punched. On this coin, the soft, smooth edges of the shallow punch are a give away that this isn't an authentic example. The edges of the punch should be squared with clear metal flow on the edges of the punch. Also the bottoms of the punches should be textured, not smooth. Finally, because the two punches were applied in separate strikes, there should be a clear, raised, overlap line between the punches, the punches shouldn't be blended together.

    Barry
     
  4. Kevon

    Kevon Member

    This was fascinating - thank you! I did notice a large influx of electrum and some seemed awfully suspicious. For others it seems challenging to tell.

    Any tips for the smaller single punch denominations? Many of the ones sold in the recent years seem to have notably shallower punches. Is that as big of a red flag on the smaller types (1/24 staters seem the most common)? Are there any genuine coins with smooth punches or should all of those be (almost) automatically condemned as fakes?
     
  5. JohnnyC

    JohnnyC Active Member

    AB2-Mil.-Unc.-6b-1-3 St.-Ros. 253-5b-4.62g-Boston 33.368.jpg

    Here's an example (from a different mint) from the Pozzi and Seltman collections in the Boston Museum of Fine Arts that wouldn't do too well under Barry Murphy's criteria.

    Ross G.
     
    Last edited: May 24, 2021
    BenSi and Bing like this.
  6. Barry Murphy

    Barry Murphy Well-Known Member

    That's completely unrelated to what I commented on above.

    Barry Murphy
     
  7. JohnnyC

    JohnnyC Active Member

    Certainly we are talking about different types. The point is that people should understand that "soft smooth edges" and the other supposed characteristics of pressed punches listed by Barry above don't necessarily imply a modern fake in all cases.

    Ross G.
     
    Last edited: May 25, 2021
  8. Barry Murphy

    Barry Murphy Well-Known Member

    This coin doesn't have soft smooth edges. It has sharp angular edges. Like I said before, unrelated to what I said.

    Barry Murphy
     
  9. JohnnyC

    JohnnyC Active Member

    It seems Barry that your idea of "sharp angular edges" is rather different from mine.

    Ross G.
     
  10. JohnnyC

    JohnnyC Active Member

    So what do we think of these two rather rough looking electrum types?

    The top one is a stater of 14.06 gm, and the bottom one is a half-stater of 6.98 gm. (Obviously they are not to scale).

    Specifically, (a) where do they come from? and (b) are they genuine?

    A2-Mil.-Unc.-4a-1 St.-Wd. 1-3-1b-14.06g-Boston 33.367.jpg A2-Mil.-Unc.-4ab-1-2 St.-1b-6.98g-Boston 37.1164.jpg

    Ross G.
     
  11. BenSi

    BenSi Well-Known Member

    Ross, Its not my time period but I learned a lot from your papers on the subject of electrum coinage.
    I stumbled into them when I had questions about electrum but from a later time period.

    Early Coinage (glebecoins.org)
     
    sand likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page