GTG: 1938-S Texas Commemorative Half

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Santinidollar, May 19, 2021.

  1. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    The coin is very clean. I see a couple TINY marks...but overall it looks very nice. I think it's a MS66 all day long.
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. CoinCorgi

    CoinCorgi Tell your dog I said hi!

    I'll go MS66+.
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  4. Beefer518

    Beefer518 Well-Known Member

    The two areas you mention are the highest points of the coin. That equals incomplete strike, not wear.

    129b.jpg

    If this was NGC, I would've gone 66, but with PCGS, I went 67.
     
  5. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    MS-65, Very nice indeed. Thanks for sharing.
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  6. J.T. Parker

    J.T. Parker Well-Known Member

    64-65...fingers not as well defined as could be.
    J.T.
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  7. Browns Fan

    Browns Fan Active Member

    Just curious, where does the wear typically appear first?
     
    thomas mozzillo likes this.
  8. Beefer518

    Beefer518 Well-Known Member

    On the high points (of any coin), which is highlighted by the red on this coin.
     
    thomas mozzillo likes this.
  9. Mountain Man

    Mountain Man Well-Known Member

    Okay, so I usually go with MS65, just because that is the most common grade many commemoratives are, but with this one, I'm not sure if it would have been down graded to MS64 or even 63 for the wear (leg looks like wear to me) or as some believe, weak strike. JMHO and hope I'm wrong.
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  10. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    I guess we have enough opinions. Enjoyed seeing what the jury had to say. A wide range of views!

    Here’s what PCGS said:


    5D906BD7-7218-4758-B6EE-213DA13C53AB.jpeg
     
  11. Beefer518

    Beefer518 Well-Known Member

    All I'll say is wow! There must be something we're not seeing in the pics. How is the luster?
     
  12. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    Luster is extremely nice. Don’t question your own grading skills. Question my photography.
     
    Beefer518 likes this.
  13. William F

    William F Well-Known Member

    OK, so I was a little off... ;) Don't care what PCGS says, it is a stunning coin no matter what grade they think it is!!
     
    PamR and Santinidollar like this.
  14. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    I was about to say 65, as I turned the page to grade it. Really attractive coin!
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  15. CoinCorgi

    CoinCorgi Tell your dog I said hi!

    They got it wrong again. When will they ever listen to me?!
     
    MIGuy and Santinidollar like this.
  16. Mike Thornton

    Mike Thornton Learning something new everyday.

    Okay I can see that. Would an incomplete strike also explain what I see as a contact mark on the obverse? Am I seeing something there that is not? Thx
     
  17. Mike Thornton

    Mike Thornton Learning something new everyday.

    Oh, I guess I guessed right. Still a beauty I'd be proud to own...
    Oh, I guess I guessed right. Still a beauty I'd be proud to own...
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  18. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    I can see it there, every bit of it. I guess I was a little quick, after judging there was no wear. My grandmother's pet Chihuahua died, too, so I was in a despondent mood. And if you don't believe that sorry excuse, I'll bet I can make up another one. :)
     
    Santinidollar and William F like this.
  19. CoinCorgi

    CoinCorgi Tell your dog I said hi!

    I would have thought it was Baffert's suspension.
     
    Last edited: May 20, 2021
    thomas mozzillo and MIGuy like this.
  20. Beefer518

    Beefer518 Well-Known Member

    Not to hijack the thread, but GTG's have a certain degree of educational value, and GTG's lead to discussion, so I'm going for it...


    If the mark is in the area in the red, it's (most likely) not a contact mark, but a 'flaw' in the planchet that didn't get struck out during the minting.

    The big question is 'How can you tell whether it's a hit or an inherent flaw?' Sometimes they blend together to the point that it's not 100% discernible, but usually you can tell. For one, the planchet flaws will (dare I say) never be in the fields, and are (dare I say) always on the highest point of the coin. Once you see enough 'weakly struck' coins, you'll get used to them. There will also be no luster, and no raised or moved metal in the unstruck area where the planchet flaws are.

    The coin that is great for learning unstruck planchet flaws is by far the Booker T Washington sub-series of the early commemoratives. The 1st coin below is a PCGS MS66+ w/CAC, and yet there are planchet flaws all along Booker's jawline. The mark in the field to the right of the portrait is a hit. This shows that unstruck planchet flaws are pretty much accepted, and can also be an indication of lack of wear (wear will smooth them out), and while do affect the grade, they don't necessarily completely kill a coin's grade.

    (Click to enlarge)

    Display.jpg

    This next one is a good comparison. It's a 1947-D BTW PCGS MS67. Note the lesser degree of planchet flaws on the high points. The mark on the cheekbone (I'm guessing here) looks like just a deeper planchet flaw, as well as the smaller one on the forehead. I do believe that the marks that run through his ear, and possible the marks going to and ending below his nose, is a hit. Not really sure though.

    (Click to enlarge)

    lf.jpg

    But that's the difference between a well-struck 67, and a weaker struck 66. In the case of the BTW's a strong/full strike is less common, and gets the bump.

    As a reference for the BTW, here is the high/wear points map:
    BTW.jpg
     
  21. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    Tell you the truth, it brought smile to my face.
     
    CoinCorgi likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page