I've checked them all and it resembles the one I posted, but not entirely. Which is to say there's some of the same doubling on both.
I'm gonna sit this set aside so I can show to my buddies (all collectors) and see what they say, because you can't get much here from the cheapseats (you know who you are).
Are you serious? It's a fact not opinion both sides of that T are doubled at one in the same time. It's a fact not opinion that's a cinch for strike doubling, not a doubled die. You need to work on differentiating fact from opinion, you seem to be unable to do it.
Just a side question. The thread is titled "Is this the 1935 Buffalo DDR? Then you agree to MD. Then you state it is a DDR. What gives?
That's what I thought until I read a couple of the lame comments, which now has me thinking "If the idiots think it's worthless than it must not be", thanks not-so-fasteddie.
So, if all of the respondents say it is not a DDR, your only recourse is to submit your coin to a TPG for confirmation. Do you find it interesting that no one agrees with you?
OP The only one that's this can be is coneca DDR 3 . Check the other site for a cross reference 2 coneca
Just do the best you can matching images to the variety side images, matters more then the scope or camera
Just wondering, what does everyone think this will grade? Trying to decide whether or not it's worth sending in for grading.
66RD at least to me and I suggest not NGC or PCGS as it will probably cost as much or less than the coin is worth.