GTG: 1897-O Morgan

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Santinidollar, Apr 23, 2021.

  1. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    Graded by NGC. Have fun!

    2E22F86D-DCD4-4800-AAFA-FE669AF89F0A.jpeg 16472D6D-E078-4CF5-B423-AD007B8C1801.jpeg
     
    potty dollar 1878 likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

    MS60 love those cracks.
     
    SensibleSal66 and Santinidollar like this.
  4. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat Well-Known Member

  5. William F

    William F Well-Known Member

    60, lot of little bag marks but still got some really nice luster!!
     
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2021
    Santinidollar likes this.
  6. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    58 - since it's a better date I'm guessing they didn't let it slide.
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  7. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    AU 58. There is slight wear in the high points.
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  8. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    AU58. Breast is a little flat even for that mint. For how the market will take her, she’s cut up pretty good, but booming with luster, so a wash, I’m thinking.
     
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2021
    Santinidollar and Morgandude11 like this.
  9. furham

    furham Good Ole Boy

    I have to agree with the majority. AU58
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  10. COOPER12

    COOPER12 Well-Known Member

    I am going to say AU-55 with all the contact marks , I think there are more than that are showing
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  11. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

  12. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    I'll be contrarian and say MS62. Downgraded my initial MS63 impression due to the mark on Liberty's neck.

    I do see the rub on the eagle's breast the others noted, but think they might have considered that light "cabinet friction" and not enough to pull it down into the AU spectrum. Then again, it is entirely possible I'm wrong there.

    So I'll guess 62, but a point or two in either direction from there wouldn't surprise me. Nor would an AU58 grade, I suppose. How's that for being all over the map?

    Still, I'll go out on a limb with 62.
     
    Magnus87 and Santinidollar like this.
  13. Anthony Mazza

    Anthony Mazza Well-Known Member

  14. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    @furham . Your always agreeing with the Majority , :hilarious::hilarious::hilarious:. Just Joking . I'll guess MS61 !
     
  15. Robert Ransom

    Robert Ransom Well-Known Member

    I'm at MS-62. I think the grader felt sorry for her, her luster helped.
     
    Last edited: Apr 24, 2021
    Santinidollar likes this.
  16. bradgator2

    bradgator2 Well-Known Member

    Tough date. A really sweet 58
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  17. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    I think there is a tiny bit of wear. I think there are too many marks to call it AU58...mainly due to the mark on the neck. I'm at AU55.
     
  18. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Plenty of hairlines and contact marks. AU55
     
  19. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    Is that a criteria we're grading circulated coins on, now, the presence of marks?
     
  20. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    MS-62 as the reverse is weakly struck.
     
  21. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    Here’s the reveal. CDN says the price more than triples at MS60 and shoots up from there. Very lusty coin, but some wear. I think it’s graded correctly. Better dates, such as this one, seldom get a slide into low MS, I’ve found.

    89DC4FC4-4D64-4803-8C9B-18BCFE50F5DC.jpeg
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page