Numista-9100. This coin is a wholesome lower-grade example with contrasting original toning. There is a faint textile pattern to the obverse toning, but that is less apparent to the eye when the coin is viewed in hand. The tint in these images is off just a tiny bit. In hand, it has more of a natural brown-grey appearance than the blue-grey seen here. Also, there is nothing wrong with the rims. The apparent flat spot seen at the top of the obverse is merely due to the photos having been cropped a little too closely. I should reimage this, but have not taken the time to do so.
I gotta say, I much prefer lower grade older US coinage. Maybe that's because I'm poor and it's all I can afford....but I think that circulated US coins from the 1800s tend to look really nice. I think yours is a great looking dime, Lord M.
I too learned to appreciate humble, well-circulated 19th century Type coins due to a small budget. Of course I like the higher grade ones, too, but it's all good.
I'm not saying I don't "like" them. I just prefer well-circulated. I prefer a lady who knows how to have a good time and has been around vs one who has been kept locked away for ~200 years lol.
I prefer coins that look like they had to work for a living. Eye appeal is my first criteria in judging any coin. If the coin isn't damaged and hasn't been harshly cleaned it will fit in my collection.
I did that to one of my selfies & it looked like I only had half a' brain... I like the "ghostly" appearance of Liberty!...
I love the look of that dime. I just like the complete and even circulated wear it has, but still enough to appreciate the artistry of the design. Great pick up!
Circulated means its been around the book more than twice and probably has some good stories to tell if it could talk.