Ancient authenticity debate

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Bart9349, Sep 25, 2009.

  1. Bart9349

    Bart9349 Junior Member

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Very good Bart :thumb:

    Now I know diddley about ancients. But I can tell you this, disagreements about such things among recognized experts abound. And not just in ancients, but in all coins. And I can honestly say that I have yet to even hear of a case where one of them gave in to the other side.

    Even when confronted with incontrovertible evidence, they stick to their original story. Not that I am saying that either side in this case has such evidence, but there have been plenty of other cases.

    Take Gobrecht dollars for example, there have been controversies surrounding these coins since they were struck ! But check the new Numismatic News for a story that throws most of the old accepted "facts" right out the window.

    Stuff like this will never go away.
     
  4. Ripley

    Ripley Senior Member

    Interesting Bart...I think that modern scientific analysis is the way to go. Traci :eek:
     
  5. jamesicus

    jamesicus Well-Known Member

    This holds true for antique arms and accoutrements also.

    James
     
  6. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    I'm no expert on Severus Alexander but those photos are sufficiently bad that I'd hope no one offers an opinion on the coins based only on them. I'm not terribly surprised that there is a difference of opinion between the two experts mentioned. This is not an exact science and we all are learning as we go.
     
  7. De Orc

    De Orc Well-Known Member

    LOL great article and I have to agree something will never change :high5:
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page