1909 IHC - Help with grade

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by SensibleSal66, Mar 16, 2021.

  1. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    I have this 1909 Indian Head Cent . Please help with grade . I've go it at EF40 or EF45 or , 1909IHCOBV-horz.jpg maybe something else ?
     
    LA_Geezer likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    I'd say it's in there. 40-45. Pix could be better, as you know.

    I like the general look of it, and I like 1909 Indians, with or without mintmarks. But the color looks a tad off, and I can't tell if that is just the poor photos, as I suspect might be the case.

    Here. Bookmark this.

    Here are the IHC. Scroll to the left to see the circulated grades.
     
  4. Long Beard

    Long Beard Well-Known Member

    An EF-40 should exhibit most of the diamonds in the lower band, weak in spots but there. AN EF45 they would all be complete. So it's tough to say judging from a photo alone. But based on the other elements I'd say you're close.
     
    Hoky77 and LA_Geezer like this.
  5. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    This is what I thought, too, but confusingly, neither the XF40 nor the XF45 plate coins on the PCGS/Photograde database shows full diamonds. Perhaps the strike varied? The XF40 plate coin is also a 1909.
     
    LA_Geezer likes this.
  6. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    The diamonds are not always helpful. Worn dies may not show that detail very well or at all. I start with the word LIBERTY and the feather details first. LIBERTY should be bold on an XF as a normal. Tough to really tell from the image. I'll guess 35 or 40.
     
    Hoky77 likes this.
  7. Robert Ransom

    Robert Ransom Well-Known Member

  8. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

  9. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    VF and looks cleaned
     
  10. LA_Geezer

    LA_Geezer Well-Known Member

    I wasn't as concerned by the color as you were, as these vary so greatly. But I rarely try to place a grade on the IHCs I buy or own. Only one of mine has been NGC certified, awarded MS-64 RD, which probably would mean that at least some others of mine might make it into higher MS status. The 1909 is a trifle easier to find in collectible condition, IMO; I've been searching for an 1869 for more than two years now at a price I would be willing to pay. I should have taken @C-B-D up on the one he had a while ago.
     
  11. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    Sorry, I adjusted the lighting and this is the color it came out . :yack:
     
  12. Hoky77

    Hoky77 Well-Known Member

    The 1864 bronze die state has to be taken into account and your pictures don't tell that story. The 1864 dies were used, polished, and used some more. When one of a die pair failed it was replaced with what they had on hand, often in very different states. This is one one where they got a lot of mileage out of the obv. die with a second or ? pairing. The details of the rev. die are fairly crisp in comparison to the well polished obv. die. This coin I'll post here is probably close to if not AU. but if you only look at the obv. it barely makes VF. Taken separately they tell a different story than the sum

    IMG_9128.JPG IMG_9127.JPG
     
  13. Robert Ransom

    Robert Ransom Well-Known Member

    Not good enough for AU. XF at best, IMO because there is wear in the obv.
     
    Hoky77 likes this.
  14. Hoky77

    Hoky77 Well-Known Member

    You are allowed slight wear on the high points. I look to the shield and the bow on the rev. and there is the slightest wear on the shield lines and bow. The obv. features are very weak from all the die polishing so when wear shows it appears to be worse than it is because we want to compare it to a normal coin. When you look at a 3 legged or 2 feather nickel or a 1922 no D LWC the AU examples are always less detailed than coins struck from fresh dies.

    This is a 1922 no d I put in my first Whitman when I was a kid. It came out of a jug my Dad put all of his wheat cents in. I don't know if it was really known as a variety then. I picked the least worn coins from that jug so I'm lucky this was the only 1922 there. The obverse grades About Good normally but the reverse is Very Fine. When you grade a coin like this you have to rely heavily on the reverse features. IMG_9476.JPG IMG_9477.JPG
     
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2021
    RonSanderson and Robert Ransom like this.
  15. Robert Ransom

    Robert Ransom Well-Known Member

    You would assign this coin a grade of...?
     
  16. Robert Ransom

    Robert Ransom Well-Known Member

    Screenshot_2021-03-16 1909 IHC - Help with grade (3).png Screenshot_2021-03-16 1909 IHC - Help with grade1.png

    Speculation on the actual coloring. What grade now?
     
  17. Hoky77

    Hoky77 Well-Known Member

    I have a friend who has one of these graded by a TPG that is a Fine 15 and this is a fair amount better. I have always thought it would go VF20
     
    Robert Ransom likes this.
  18. Hoky77

    Hoky77 Well-Known Member

  19. Robert Ransom

    Robert Ransom Well-Known Member

    I'm thinking VF25/rev, G06 at best/obv = VF20, IMO.
     
    Hoky77 likes this.
  20. Razz

    Razz Critical Thinker

    EF has to have the ribbon with the diamonds as distinct from the hair curl. If it is flat then not EF.
     
  21. TheFinn

    TheFinn Well-Known Member

    Or strikes that aren't full.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page