United States: silver Morgan dollar, 1881-S Very common date, and a date that is typically found in high quality, but a nice shiny Gem nonetheless. I got a decent price on it. One day I might replace it with a DMPL, but for now, it will do just fine. https://www.pcgs.com/cert/84693759 https://www.pcgs.com/coinfacts/coin/1881-s-1/7130/65 010000S
Hello LM, I hope all is well. From the pics you posted I feel the coin is under graded. I have owned and seen 66's and 67's that weren't that nice and clean. Why do you think the coin received the 65 grade? That coin is truly a choice piece! Tibor
Looks great to me, but then my eyesight is poor and I could not take a better picture than this if my life depended on it.
Ditto!! I don't think there is a bad Morgan (unless it's fake); each one tells a story. If it's an old cruddy AG example...ya just gotta wonder how it got that way
I didn't see any reference to grade in the question, so, I won't offer a grade. The question was more on the order of interest and appeal. My only interest in any coin is eye appeal. I don't care about grade. The subject coin is interesting and has great eye appeal. I give it a 10.
Very nice! Mine's probably a 62 at best, but I'll be hanging on to it for the long haul, because it's the one I got when my grandfather gave a silver dollar to each of the grandkids one long-ago Christmas.
I can only suppose that since the 1880-S and 1881-S coins typically come so nice, they might judge those dates more strictly (while if it was a Carson City piece, they might give it more leeway, since those were more prone to bagmarks). But I dunno. Truth be told, I am not a Morganite, myself- they bore me a tiny bit, since you see so many of them. (I'm usually a "road less traveled" kinda guy.) But they're undeniably handsome coins- in any grade. And anyone with an eclectic collection like mine should have at least one, right? I thought this one was worth the hundred bucks postpaid I gave for it. PCGS trend price is $165 as I type this, and shows a recent price increase.
Nice coin, most of them(with that date) are graded 62-65, I do think that one is a bit over graded, looks to me to be MS62-63. JMO Stay Safe.
I like the circs more than the MS pieces sometimes, for "character". I feel this way about Bust halves. I haven't met a Bust half I didn't like yet. Even the early fake ones, if they're contemporary counterfeits.
I think it is a nice coin. Great luster, and eye appeal. One of the nicer non-PL 1881s coins that I have seen recently.
Would have been a 10, but came down one (to a 9...a penalty stroke) for the upside-down reverse photo. Last words, if not so "famous"...shoot the coin, not the label.