1963-D 1¢ WDDO-048?

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by RBurk, Feb 15, 2021.

  1. RBurk

    RBurk Active Member

    This looks like it may be a DD per Wexler. Can anyone confirm? BTW, this coin came out of circulation. No idea how it came out in such good condition. Note that I don't believe the neck and vest are part of the doubling.

    WIN_20210215_11_42_23_Pro.jpg WIN_20210215_11_42_23_Pro.jpg WIN_20210215_11_42_43_Pro.jpg WIN_20210215_11_42_49_Pro.jpg WIN_20210215_11_43_09_Pro.jpg WIN_20210215_11_43_22_Pro.jpg WIN_20210215_11_43_44_Pro.jpg WIN_20210215_11_44_38_Pro.jpg WIN_20210215_11_45_31_Pro.jpg
     
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2021
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Kevin Mader

    Kevin Mader Fellow Coin Enthusiast Supporter

    Looks like a DDO but you’ll have to figure out which one.
     
  4. RBurk

    RBurk Active Member

    Thanks Kevin. The closest I can find is Wexler 1963-D 1C wddo-048. There are many doubles of the 1963 D missing though and while this looks very close, it's not exact.
     
  5. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor

    It does seem to have more die deterioration signs, that affect the rim flattened areas. This being a double squeeze era coin, there should be signs of 'height' on the possible doubling, rather than flat. Die deterioration is usual when the rim area letters are close to touching the edge such as the L and T. IMO, Jim
     
  6. RBurk

    RBurk Active Member

    Thanks for your input. There are raised areas on the R, U and last T in trust. They look very similar to Wexler 1963-D 1C wddo-048. I think it's is a different doubling though as there seem to be 1 or 2 differences. Wexler has many doubles shown for that coin without pic's or descriptions.
     
  7. RBurk

    RBurk Active Member

    Thanks desertgem. Maybe the pic's don't show the rim correctly. It's a very strong rim all around the coin.
     
  8. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor

    A mischoice of words for me. I should have said the flattened doubling on the obverse close to the rim. Typing and doing other things too much. Jim
     
  9. Kevin Mader

    Kevin Mader Fellow Coin Enthusiast Supporter

    I agree -48 has similarities. Let me look into this some. I was trying to do it from my phone...not the right tool for the job.
     
  10. Kevin Mader

    Kevin Mader Fellow Coin Enthusiast Supporter

    @RBurk You may have a discovery piece. I took a look at Wexler's listings, Coppercoins, and Variety Vista. I don't see a match and while -048 is close, I think it's different. You have the piece in hand and it's possible that the markers for -048 are for a die stage different than yours. So you might want to send it to Wexler for examination. He can determine if it is a different die state or a new discovery. I'm leaning a new discovery. Nice find from the wild!!
     
    RBurk likes this.
  11. RBurk

    RBurk Active Member

    Thanks for your input Kevin! I'm emailing John with pics to see if he's interested in seeing it. I'll let you know when I hear back.
     
  12. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    Those devices are just mangled due to the strike from the fatigued die.
     
  13. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

    How about a full shot of the reverse
    Need it for markers
     
  14. RBurk

    RBurk Active Member

    You got it! Let me know if you need closer shots of any area.

    upload_2021-2-16_16-32-56.png
     
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2021
  15. Kevin Mader

    Kevin Mader Fellow Coin Enthusiast Supporter

    @RBurk Can you see these markers from Wexler?
    Reverse: A light die scratch runs SW from the bottom of the 2nd S in STATES to the top of the 2nd U of PLURIBUS. A die scratch runs SW from the bottom of the 1st U in PLURIBUS to the top of the 2nd U in UNUM.
     
  16. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

    How about a image of Abe eye
     
    Kevin Mader likes this.
  17. RBurk

    RBurk Active Member

    My original post showed the wrong coin. I've replaced it with a correct pic in a new post.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Feb 17, 2021
  18. RBurk

    RBurk Active Member

    I don't see them, but I'm a total novice. I've take a couple of closeups for your review.

    The original pics posted were from a different coin. The correct pics are shown in a new post below.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Feb 17, 2021
  19. RBurk

    RBurk Active Member

    WIN_20210217_10_39_58_Pro.jpg
     
  20. RBurk

    RBurk Active Member

    WIN_20210217_10_52_34_Pro.jpg WIN_20210217_10_53_59_Pro.jpg
     
  21. RBurk

    RBurk Active Member

    Here are the corrected pics:

    WIN_20210217_10_52_34_Pro.jpg WIN_20210217_10_53_59_Pro.jpg
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page