Photographing Paper Money

Discussion in 'Paper Money' started by the_man12, Jun 10, 2009.

  1. the_man12

    the_man12 Amateur Photographer

    I was just wondering how you guys get such good pictures. I've got the coins down, but I'm lost when it comes to currency imaging.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    I usually scan the notes. ;)
     
  4. north49guy

    north49guy Show me the Money

    I usually put it the notes on a black background like a binder or something, and under a light from above, it usually does a pretty good job. Scanned a few but it makes them too washout/white I find.
     
  5. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    These are both scanned and I think they look good:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  6. north49guy

    north49guy Show me the Money

    Here is the difference when I scan vs. photos... I find that the photo shows the actual condition of the note better (the folds, creases etc) The scanned note is better condition then the one photo'd anyways but I dont think the scanned one is as good as it looks in the scan.

    Scan

    [​IMG]


    Camera

    [​IMG]
     
  7. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    I think for a fair comparison you'd need to have the same note imaged in both ways. I have noticed that scanning them does seem to take a little of the wrinkling out in the image sometimes...plus, both notes I posted are CHCU.

    Here is a well circulated note I got out of circulation a while back. This is scanned and I think it's an honest image of the notes condition. I think it also depends on the scanner and software though.

    [​IMG]
     
  8. north49guy

    north49guy Show me the Money



    I agree with the note thing, it is hard to tell. And ya my settings could be off or something.
     
  9. Daggarjon

    Daggarjon Supporter**

    i scan all my currency, and image all my coins.

    Reagrdless of scanned versus imaging notes, both can easily hide defects in the notes. Alot of depends ont he integrity of the person imaging/scanning the note. If the person wishes to hide imperfections, it can be done. Like other folks here, i prefer to get the closest possible version of the actual note. Different scanners will certainly do a better job then others, as will cameras be different frome ach other and from scanners.

    I prefer scanning notes because it is alot quicker and easier with my batch scanning function (put 4 notes on the glas, hit scan, and i get 4 different images!), and scanning my notes gives me images that are very close to what the note actually looks like, so there is no incentive for me to use my camera instead.
     
  10. dursin

    dursin Senior Member

    All my notes are scanned and they tend to come out pretty good. You can see all of them if you click the link in my sig.
     
  11. RickieB

    RickieB Expert Plunger Sniper

    I use a Epson Perfection 3170... most scanned images are at 150-300 dpi..
    I cover the top inside lid with black paper for a black background.

    For images that I really want to "pop" I scan at 600 dpi and above.


    Do not know if that model still exist, but they are great scanners!


    RickieB
     
  12. Daggarjon

    Daggarjon Supporter**

    Epson scanners are the devil :D

    I really do like the images i get from my current Epson .... i just dont like how Epson limits my activities!!!!

    Anyhoot... i think the decision as to wheather you use a camera or scanner for your imagin needs comes down to you. If you can get better images froma camera, do that. I just liek the speed and ease in which i can scan my notes. But if my scanner didnt do such a good job at creating images, i might not be so inclined to stick with it.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page