Stats on fancy serial numbers

Discussion in 'Paper Money' started by dursin, Apr 14, 2009.

  1. dursin

    dursin Senior Member

    After reading some of the recent notes on fancy serial numbers I became curious as to how many notes in a given run would qualify as fancy. Given a run from 1 to 96000000, I came up with the following:

    5 Ladder notes (3 forward, 2 reverse)
    8 Solid
    660 Single digit notes (00040000, 99299999, etc...)
    9,591 Radar
    9,591 Repeater
    10,671 Binary
    657,889 Trinary

    So, looks like Radar, Repeaters and Binary notes are close to equal in rarity at approximate 1 out of 10,000, ladder and Solid are extremely rare and Trinary seem to be too common to be worth any premium.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Daggarjon

    Daggarjon Supporter**

    12345678, 234567890, 01234567, 34567890, 45678901, 11121314, 22232425 .. ect

    there are way more then 5 ladders in a complete run of notes. Radars, because the 1st 4 digits have to equal the last 4 digits, yes, 1 in about 10,000. Number has done an extremely nice discussion on that somewhere :)
     
  4. dursin

    dursin Senior Member

    Only ones I count are 012345678, 12345678, 23456789, 87654321 and 76543210. I don't really consider any others to be ladders, especially onles like 11121314, 22232425, etc...
     
  5. RickieB

    RickieB Expert Plunger Sniper

    I recall seeing that Thread and reading it...Great info to say the least!!
    Still a good post dursin...but if you find Numbers Thread check it out!!


    RickieB
     
  6. Daggarjon

    Daggarjon Supporter**

    oh sure :D if you want to make it easier to count lol
     
  7. dursin

    dursin Senior Member

    Actually after looking at many sites, the reason I didn't count those others as ladders is because...they are not ladders. Wasn't that hard to count either...wrote a small C++ program to iterate through all possible serial numbers from 1 through 96,000,000 and had it keep track of the interesting ones. :)

    I looked through just about all of Numbers posts (8 pages worth) and while he has commented on the frequency of certain fancy serial numbers, I couldn't find any post which went into detail on them...if I missed it and someone else comes across the post, please reply with the link.

    Thanks!

    btw: Some interesting info on this site:
    http://www.iccurrency.com/ref_fancy.htm
     
  8. Daggarjon

    Daggarjon Supporter**

    not to be (too) arguementative.. but isnt a 'ladder' a note that either sequentially goes up or down in the numbers of the serial? A pattern that forms as a result... why wouldnt 11121314 or 12341235 be ladders? ir 12341234 can be a repeater, then 12341235 should be a ladder....

    just thinking out loud :)
     
  9. CoinKeeper

    CoinKeeper Keeper of Coins

    Great info! I have a Canadian $1 binary radar note serial number 1666661 :D
     
  10. Daggarjon

    Daggarjon Supporter**

    a binary radar :) very neat lol
     
  11. CoinKeeper

    CoinKeeper Keeper of Coins

    a combo of two, lol

    What are the approximate odds of such a note occuring?
     
  12. dursin

    dursin Senior Member

    Out of 96,000,000 notes printed in a run, 591 will be both binary and radar, so the odds are approximately 1 in 162,000.
     
  13. Numbers

    Numbers Senior Member

    The problem with "ladder" is that people apply it to all sorts of things, all of which are kinda-sorta similar to a perfect ladder like 12345678, but not very similar to each other. So pretty soon the word ends up covering almost anything if you're not careful....

    For example, people might apply the word "ladder" to:

    -stuttering ladders like 11234445 or even 11245779
    -ladder progressives like 00012345 or 67890000
    -ladderish numbers with random zeroes thrown in, as 34050678
    -serials like you mentioned above, as 12 13 14 15 or 78 79 80 81
    -the same with extra zeroes allowed, as 56 0 57 0 58 or even 56 57 00 58

    At some point one has to draw the line. It's pretty well agreed that the five numbers Dursin mentioned are definitely ladders, plus 98765432 back when it used to be printed. Beyond that, some people won't agree with the term "ladder" being applied, so better to leave them out to avoid an argument.

    (Personally, I think 11245779 is "more of a ladder" than 12131415. But that's a vague enough concept that I don't expect anyone else to *care* what I think, frankly.... :rolleyes:)

    And, y'know, I thought I'd posted something like this thread way-back-when as well, but I can't now find it either. Must've been a mass hallucination or something.... Anyway, thanks for the calculations, Dursin! :cool:
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page