1913 type 1 buff

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by johnny54321, Mar 9, 2009.

  1. johnny54321

    johnny54321 aspiring numismatist

    What would you grade this? The seller had it listed as an XF, but it appears better than that to me. I'm far from an expert on buffs though.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. cncman

    cncman Senior Member

    You pick that up for XF money and you are doing real well, nice coin. looks to me like an AU slider.

     
  4. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    I'd pay XF money for that coin all day long and twice on Sunday!

    You made a good buy IMHO.
     
  5. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    Looks nicer than XF to me too, but that reverse rim gash is problematic.
     
  6. jello

    jello Not Expert★NormL®

    EF for sure!!!
     
  7. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    It looks just a shade below AU to me. Just a shade of wear on the Buffalo shoulder.
     
  8. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    I wouldn't be surprised if that was weak strike, Ruben. Look at the die degradation in the area of the rim and E Pluribus Unum, as these dies wore this area started to noticably degrade. These letters are weak and blending into the field, so IMHO, the area you are looking at is due to weak strike, and not wear. Luster breaks are hard to tell from pics though, and so I suggest an in-hand examination to determine whether this is weak strike or wear.
     
  9. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    P.S. If this seller consistently grades coins like this, I'd have to look at everything he's selling. There may be some real bargains!
     
  10. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    I agree 100% and I noticed the lettering. But from what I can see of from the photograph there seems to be definite luster break on the cheek of the Indian and the change in coloration I don't think can be attributed to strike. But the details seem to be AU with the possible exception of the shoulder area. Can that be weak strike? Maybe, but their is wear on the obverse which makes me discount the probability of that. The main issue at this point is luster. If the coin has original luster then I don't see any reason why this coin isn't AU53. At worst this coin, IMO, is just a shade below AU.
    And as I recall, these coins are famous for their terrific strikes.

    Ruben
     
  11. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I agree, weak strike. But not due to die wear IMO. More likely badly adjusted dies. The strike is too stong elsewhere, the coin even has finning.

    That said, I wouldn't buy this coin on a bet. Body-bag material.
     
  12. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    also there is some action going on in the "FIVE CENTS"

    Ruben
     
  13. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member


    WATCH OUT EVERYONE --- INCOMING INCOMING !!!!!!



    Do you have to wait for us to ask?

    Ruben
     
  14. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    not even as an XF Doug?
     
  15. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Not even as an XF. The rim dings, 5 o'clock obv and 6 rev will bag that coin. Why buy a problem coin when multitudes of problem free examples are out there ?
     
  16. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    I don't see any hard rim dents. I see some kind of what looks like a scrape or errosion on the top of the obverse of the rim and on the bottom of the reverse, but I thought that had to be a minting issue.

    Ruben
     
  17. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    hiccup - there seems to be some connectivity issue today between NY and San Jose
     
  18. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    This is my Type I and as I recall it wasn't that expensive so I agree with Doug that there is no reason to get involved with a problem Buffalo Nickel
     
  19. FreakyGarrettC

    FreakyGarrettC Wise young snail

    Hey man12, yours is nice and if you like it that is all that matters.
     
  20. AUBU2

    AUBU2 Senior Member

    Becareful of seller

    Warning!!! Does the auction state that you will receive the exact coin pictured? You may receive an XF example that does'nt look anything near the pictured coin. Everything on Ebay is geared to the written descrption of the item. If the seller has no return policy & uses a remote website to list his pictures then beware. After the auction ends the pictures from some of these remote picture sites are no longer viewable. Thus you are left with an auction listing stating XF, and no picture to compare to the coin the seller sent. And with no picture, ebay only has the XF descrption(so your stuck with the coin the seller sends).I suggest if your serious about buying this coin to do two things. (1) Check auction to make sure there is a return policy. (2). Email the seller and ask if you are going to receive the exact coin pictured. Then save the auction with the pictures to a file on your computer for future proof to Ebay(Also, save the email the seller sends you regarding the coin). Be careful, i've been taken numerous times on Ebay(but i'm also learning from my mistakes!
     
  21. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    OK Ruben - the first 2 pics show evidence of the finning I mentioned which indicates that the coin was struck with excessive pressure, but probably mis-adjusted dies.

    The second 2 pics show the bad rim dings I mentioned. The obv 5 o'clock pic shows a large piece actually missing, but the rev is the worse of the two. They should be more than enough to classify the coin as damaged.
     

    Attached Files:

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page