We would need better pictures to know for sure. From what I can see, she's a beaut. From this picture, the surfaces look slick enough to warrant a PL designation. DMPL? Not sure.
yes, we are going to need to see better pics. it should look frosted on the raised surfaces to get pl
Not a chance, even based on those pics the coin does not have the surfaces that would qualify it as DMPL. Easy test for you to tell - hold some printed text, like a business card, 6 to 8 inches in front of the coin. If you can clearly read the text in the reflection on the coin (just like you could with a mirror) then the coin would qualify as DMPL. If you can't - it isn't.
the way the light it that can be lint on the surface... just saying so that people don't think I'm always agreeing (sucking up) to you. Ruben
I will try the reflectivity test. It just seemed so much more bright and shiny than my other coins that I wondered if it was PL or DMPL. I actually have about 12 of these, presumably from the same roll. They were included in a larger group of Morgans I purchased recently. Anyone think this could be an MS65 or 66?
Nice coin , it may be PL . When you hold it and let the light bounce back at you like a mirror it should almost look black . The PL and DMPL designations are based on how far away it acts like a mirror . rzage
From the pics it's hard to tell but I think there's a chance at 65 or 66 , but would need better pics to tell . rzage
Ive been looking for the distances of reflection for over an hour , I should of just PMed you .:bow: Rusty:thumb: and Ruben it ain't sucking up if the praise is justified .
Not a huge amount. Could not read the business card 8" away. I could see my fingers in the reflection and I could see the card, just not much detail. Does that mean it's not PL either?
