Handling Coins Question

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by SensibleSal66, Dec 12, 2020.

  1. Cheech9712

    Cheech9712 Every thing is a guess

    I see your point
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Cheech9712

    Cheech9712 Every thing is a guess

    Glitch
     
  4. Cheech9712

    Cheech9712 Every thing is a guess

    Will you show one of these album’s pages?
     
  5. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    If I may ask, how does one push coins down into album holes without touching the surface of the coin ? To my knowledge it can't be done without touching some part/s of the surface.
     
  6. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Grasp them firmly by the edges, then throw them hard at the hole, so that they hit it squarely and sink in. ;)
     
    Stevearino likes this.
  7. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Tell ya what, I'll hold your beer and watch while you do it :D
     
    ldhair and Stevearino like this.
  8. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    LOL @GDJMSP . I like that one. ;)
     
  9. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Because they differentiate between "circulation wear" and wear caused by coin to coin friction such as roll/stacking friction. So yes, a Saint with roll friction on the breast/knee is still uncirculated and can grade as high as MS67. For example:

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    When the TPGs look for circulation wear, they typically look for some disturbance in the fields. In absence of field disturbance, slight high point wear is often viewed as coin to coin friction and the coin is graded as a mint state coin.
     
    furham likes this.
  10. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Honestly, I think people waaaaaaaayyyyyy overreact to fingerprints. They can be distracting or even ugly, but sometimes, I think they actually provide some character to a coin. Here is a 1940-S Jefferson Nickel that I think looks very cool with a fingerprint. So cool in fact, that I have added it to my album collection.

    [​IMG]


    And while Doug and I don't agree on much, we do agree that wearing gloves reduces your dexterity, vastly increases your probability that you will drop the coin and cause a rim ding (or worse), and should never be word when handling coins.
     
  11. Publius2

    Publius2 Well-Known Member

    I tried cotton gloves for a while and found they made me even more clumsy than my natural dis-talents (love to make up words). After some thought, I also realized that the cotton would absorb my skin oils eventually and potentially transfer them to the coins. So, I gave them up.

    Now, I handle the coins with my bare fingers, carefully by the edges, while I sneeze on them.
     
    ldhair, Stevearino and CoinCorgi like this.
  12. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Great! Now we just need someone else to provide the coins and the album.
     
  13. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    And the entire concept, as well as their pitiful explanation, is ridiculous ! There is no absolutely no way for anyone to distinguish wear caused by one thing from wear caused by another thing - it is physically impossible ! And besides that, a coin can obtain wear on it before it ever leaves the mint. AND - a coin can be in actual commercial circulation - and not have any wear on it ! So a coin being in commercial circulation has absolutely nothing to do with anything. And what's worse - they know all that - they've always known all that !

    They do it so they can over-grade coins and make their customers happy so the money keeps rolling in.

    And Paul, you can try and make any excuse, any explanation, you want for them. But not a one of them holds water - not a one. Wear is wear, regardless of what causes it. And if a coin has wear it is not and cannot be MS !
     
    Stevearino likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page