GTG: 1898 o Morgan

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Morgandude11, Oct 3, 2020.

?

Grade, please

  1. MS 60

    1 vote(s)
    8.3%
  2. MS 61

    1 vote(s)
    8.3%
  3. MS 62

    2 vote(s)
    16.7%
  4. MS 63

    3 vote(s)
    25.0%
  5. MS 64

    6 vote(s)
    50.0%
  6. MS 65

    4 vote(s)
    33.3%
  7. PL

    6 vote(s)
    50.0%
  8. DMPL

    1 vote(s)
    8.3%
  9. +

    3 vote(s)
    25.0%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Latest acquisition:

    01E80A5A-8C9A-49EB-9D30-3549D8FAE32E.jpeg A8CEEBFF-4A8D-48B0-B5B9-39408045F9F9.jpeg
     
    ddddd likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    MS 64
    ...fields look clean but the cheek has some grazes
    ...the reverse looks PL but the obverse appears like it just misses (although it might be the angle of the photo)
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  4. furham

    furham Good Ole Boy

    Maybe it's your photo. MS63.
     
  5. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

  6. ZoidMeister

    ZoidMeister Hamlet Squire of Tomfoolery . . . . .

    MS65 PL+
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  7. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Seller’s photos. Just bought the coin yesterday.
     
  8. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

  9. CommemHalfScrub

    CommemHalfScrub Active Member

  10. bradgator2

    bradgator2 Well-Known Member

    Too easy a year to not be high grade. Hard to say on the cheek marks. 64 PL. could easily be 65PL.
     
  11. atcarroll

    atcarroll Well-Known Member

    I'm seeing a 64+ or low end 65, based on the photos.
     
  12. slackaction1

    slackaction1 Supporter! Supporter

    Don't bother looking at this guess using my "Making The Grade book" MS 63 because marks are lighter and less concentrated but not disfiguring.. maybe..
     
  13. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Okay, some got it right on.

    42D8E0DE-9CB6-441A-B8E8-B941C783A81B.jpeg
     
  14. slackaction1

    slackaction1 Supporter! Supporter

    When PCGS puts PL behind number.... Does it make the coin worth more with that designation? instead of a plain MS 64
     
  15. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Absolutely. PL coins can be worth 3-10 times more than the same grade that is not Prooflike. DMPL coins (Deep Mirror Prooflike) can be worth 5-20 times more than the same date/grade, depending on grade and rarity.
     
    slackaction1 likes this.
  16. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I'm late and was at 64 but not the PL.
     
  17. slackaction1

    slackaction1 Supporter! Supporter

    Are you late when its your turn to buy Nut...you was spot on guess. so what's the difference when they put 64+ the plus sign..
     
    Collecting Nut likes this.
  18. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    Sometimes I just don't know myself. Lol
     
    Morgandude11 and slackaction1 like this.
  19. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat Well-Known Member

    Late as well but I would have said 64+. It looked like a one sider PL from the images posted.
     
    furham likes this.
  20. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    8B4180EB-2154-4495-AD09-6FC4408614D4.jpeg
    It is a solid PL. Came in the mail yesterday evening. Here is a better shot of the obverse as a quick cell phone pic:
     
  21. furham

    furham Good Ole Boy

    You must have awfully quick mail service.
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page