The Monster Toned Coin Game Thread

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by ddddd, Jul 15, 2020.

  1. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    Summary Chapter 1
    Rd. 1: 1883-O Morgan NGC MS63* [Obv]...CT -> 3.6 (Mid) vs You -> 4 (Mid-High)
    Rd. 2: 1880 Morgan PCGS MS62 [Obv]...CT -> 2.7 (Low-Mid) vs You -> 3 (Mid)
    Rd. 3: 1881-S Morgan PCGS MS65 [Rev]...CT -> 3 (Mid) vs You -> 3 (Mid)
    Rd. 4: 1880-S Morgan PCGS MS65 [Obv]...CT -> 4.6 (Mid-High) vs You -> 5 (High)
    Rd. 5: 1880-S Morgan NGC MS66* [Obv]...CT -> 3.2 (Mid) vs You -> 3 (Mid)
    Rd. 6: 1880-S Morgan PCGS MS?? [Rev]...CT -> 3.5 (Mid) vs You -> 3 (Mid)
    Rd. 7: 1887 Morgan PCGS MS64 [Obv]...CT-> 4.2 (Mid-High) vs You-> 4 (Mid-High)
    Rd. 8: 1939-D Lincoln PCGS MS65RB [Obv]...CT-> 4.1 (Mid-High) vs You-> 5 (High)
    Rd. 9: 1972-D Ike PCGS MS63 [Obv]...CT-> 2.3 (Low-Mid) vs You-> 2 (Low-Mid)
    Rd. 10: 1892 GB Half Crown PCGS MS64 [Dual]...CT-> 4 (Mid-High) vs You-> 4 (Mid-High)
    Rd. 11: 1967 UK Half Crown PCGS MS65+ [Dual]...CT-> 3 (Mid) vs You-> 3 (Mid)
    Rd. 12: 1963 Franklin NGC MS65+* FBL [Rev]...CT-> 4 (Mid-High) vs You-> 4 (Mid-High)
    Rd. 13: 1884-O Morgan PCGS MS63+ [Obv]...CT -> 5 (High) vs You -> 5 (High)
    Rd. 14: 1899 GB 6 Pence PCGS MS65 [Dual]...CT-> 5 (High) vs You-> 5 (High)
    Rd. 15: 1926 F.I.C. Piastre PCGS AU58 [Dual]...CT-> 3 (Mid) vs You-> 5 (High)
    Rd. 16: 1904 USP Peso NGC PF62 [Dual]...CT-> 2.8 (Low-Mid) vs You-> 4 (Mid-High)
    Rd. 17: 1944 Jeff Nickel PCGS MS 66 [Obv]...CT-> 4.8 (Mid-High) vs You-> 5 (High)
    Rd. 18: 1880-S Morgan PCGS MS 66+ [Obv]...CT-> 2.7 (Low-Mid) vs You-> 3 (Mid)
    Rd. 19: 1881-S Morgan PCGS MS 68+ [Obv]...CT-> 6 (Monster) vs You-> 6 (Monster)
    Rd. 20: 1887 Morgan PCGS MS 66+ [Obv]...CT-> 5.3 (High) vs You-> 6 (Monster)
    Rd. 21: 1880-S Morgan NGC MS 66* [Obv]...CT-> 4.5 (Mid-High) vs You-> 5 (High)
    Rd. 22: 1941-D Jeff Nickel NGC MS 67* 5FS [Dual]...CT-> 4.9 (Mid-High) vs You-> 6 (Monster)
    Rd. 23: 1961 Franklin 50c PCGS PR 65 [Dual]...CT-> 5.3 (High) vs You-> 6 (Monster)
    Rd. 24: 1884-O Morgan NGC MS 61* [Obv]...CT-> 2.7 (Low-Mid) vs You-> 4 (Mid-High)
    Rd. 25: 1941-D Jeff Nickel PCGS MS 66 FS [Dual]...CT-> 3.6 (Mid) vs You-> 3 (Mid)
    Rd. 26: 1708 GB Shilling PCGS MS64 [Dual]...CT-> 2.8 (Low-Mid) vs You-> 3 (Mid)
    Rd. 27: 1880-S Morgan PCGS MS64 PL [Rev]...CT -> 5 (High) vs You -> 5 (High)
    Rd. 28: 1835 10c PCGS AU58 [Rev]...CT -> 3.9 (Mid) vs You -> 5 (High)
    Rd. 29: 1888 Morgan PCGS MS65+ [Obv]...CT -> 4 (Mid-High) vs You -> 4 (Mid-High)
    Rd. 30: 1904-O Morgan NGC MS64 [Dual]...CT -> 3 (Mid) vs You -> 2 (Low-Mid)

    Summary Chapter 2
    Rd. 31: 1878 8tf Morgan PCGS MS66 [Obv]...CT -> 5.5 (High) vs You -> 6.0 (Monster)
    Rd. 32: 1880-s Morgan PCGS MS63 [Obv]...CT -> 4.7 (Mid-High) vs You -> 5.3 (High)
    Rd. 33: 1881-S Morgan NGC MS 66* [Obv]...CT-> 5.6 (High) vs You-> 6 (Monster)
    Rd. 34: 1868 4D Mdy PCGS MS 65 [Dual]...CT-> 3.1 (Mid) vs You-> 3.5 (Mid)
    Rd. 35: 1884-O Morgan NGC MS 64* [Obv]...CT-> 4.2 (Mid-High) vs You-> 5 (High)
    Rd. 36: 1884-O Morgan NGC MS 64* [Obv]...CT-> 4.3 (Mid-High) vs You-> 5 (High)
    Rd. 37: 1881-S Morgan Raw [obv]...CT -> 1.8 (Low) vs You -> 1.7 (Low)
    Rd. 38: 1877-CC Quarter PCGS AU 58 [Dual]...CT -> 3.4 (Mid) vs You -> 4.8 (Mid-High)
    Rd. 39: 1919 Franc PCGS MS 66 [Dual]...CT -> 2.9 (Low-Mid) vs You -> 3.5 (Mid)
    Rd. 40: 1887 Morgan PCGS MS64 [Obv]...CT -> 5.8 (High) vs You -> 6.0 (Monster)
    Rd. 41: 1974-S Ike Raw [Obv]...CT -> 2.5 (Low-Mid) vs You -> 2.0 (Low-Mid)
    Rd. 42: 1885-O Morgan NGC MS63* [Obv]...CT -> 2.8 (Low-Mid) vs You -> 3.0 (Mid)
    Rd. 43: 1958-D Franklin NGC MS64* [Dual]...CT -> 4.5 (Mid-High) vs You -> 4.9 (Mid-High)
    Rd. 44: 1886 Morgan PCGS MS66 [Obv]...CT -> 5.9 (High) vs You -> 6.0 (Monster)
    Rd. 45: 1883-O Morgan NGC MS63* [Rev]...CT -> 3.5 (Mid) vs You -> 3.0 (Mid)
    Rd. 46: 1958-D Franklin NGC MS67* [Dual]...CT -> 4.1 (Mid-High) vs You -> 5.5 (High)
    Rd. 47: 1888 Morgan Anacs MS63 [Obv]...CT -> 5.1 (High) vs You -> 5.4 (High)
    Rd. 48: 1961 10c PCGS MS66+ [Obv]...CT -> 4.5 (Mid-High) vs You -> 4.7 (Mid-High)
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    The dime I had as a 4.7. I normally don't collect dimes (I think they are a little too small to appreciate the toning), but this one I liked and it's the only toned dime in my core collection.

    @Morgandude11 you are up...
     
  4. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    Dime is pretty 4.8
     
  5. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

  6. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    Strong. 5.4 I like
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  7. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    That seller tends to juice photos. I’m struggling to figure out what it really looks like but as is, I’m not a big fan.
    I’d call it a 3.5
     
    LuxUnit likes this.
  8. wxcoin

    wxcoin Getting no respect since I was a baby

    I love the vivid coloring; especially the cosmic blues! I'll give it a 6.
     
  9. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Holy cow: 5.9

    If it were MS65 I would give it a 6, those luster grazes on the cheek matter.
     
  10. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    I got outbid for this coin, by $90. It went for over a thousand. Sorry I did not bid higher. The coin picture is not juiced, to my knowledge
     
  11. kSigSteve

    kSigSteve Active Member

  12. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    6. A monster to my eyes. Yes there are better out there but I like this one quite a lot. The more you look at it the more colors you see.


    Edit: After the following discussion, I'm pretty uncertain...guess you can put me in at 4.7 if others are changing their opinions.
     
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2020
    wxcoin likes this.
  13. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    The die crack is fun too
     
  14. brg5658

    brg5658 Well-Known Member

    For the Roosie dime - 4.6

    For the 1883 Morgan - 5.2 (too much yellow for higher IMO)
     
  15. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    You make me feel bad that I didn’t hang in there for the final bid, and raise it. I stubbornly hung in there with my max bid.

    My rating is 5.9. It is a monster, but the grade is a slight limiting factor.
     
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2020
    longshot and wxcoin like this.
  16. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    I'll say you were fortunate to not win it. I've looked at plenty of eBay auctions and this photo is almost certainly manipulated. In hand you would have likely seen a middle of the pack coin that is nowhere near as vibrant as the photo.
     
    LuxUnit likes this.
  17. CircCam

    CircCam Victory

    177684DA-D038-4154-BA9A-C0F4774912DA.jpeg

    I’m judging off of the above photo as I believe that is closer to what it actually would look like in hand. I call it a solid 4. I could be wrong but to me the OP photos absolutely look like the saturation is cranked.

    I personally think the coin is more attractive without the juicing anyway.
     
    Mainebill, LuxUnit, brg5658 and 2 others like this.
  18. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Who is the seller?
     
  19. ddddd

    ddddd Member

  20. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    If the coin looks more like this photo, as opposed to the sold photos I posted, no way I would have paid $1000 bucks for that. It would be a nice 4-4.4 coin, but no monster, and not worth a grand. I have never seen the coin.
     
    CircCam likes this.
  21. brg5658

    brg5658 Well-Known Member

    It should tell you at least a little something that one of this sellers coins that sold in the auction on 30 Aug on eBay for $445, also sold again on 15 Sep for a "best offer". It was likely not as the picture looked and was returned by the auction winner on 30 Aug. Just a guess. It could also be a bidder that didn't pay - but usually you'd just offer it to the under-bidder in that case.

    sold_twice_coin.jpg
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page