1970 Roosevelt Dime with Reverse of 1968-S Proof Variety

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Candice Wise, Sep 2, 2020.

  1. Candice Wise

    Candice Wise Active Member

    I found this last night.. Dad had it stuck with tape to a 1970s calendar.. I hope I have this one right.. No mint mark on the obverse.. You can see where the coin used to be gold electroplated.. Weighs only 2.27 grams.. High Relief torch on the reverse.. The A and M in America are touching.. The C and A in America are touching as well.. IN and We are fat on obverse.. So is the TRU in Trust.. What do y'all think??
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Fred Weinberg

    Fred Weinberg Well-Known Member

    I don't think so
     
    Kentucky and Candice Wise like this.
  4. Candice Wise

    Candice Wise Active Member

    WOW.. The torch matches.. I tr tripled checked before I posted it because I'm always getting stuff wrong.. What did I miss if you don't mind me asking.. I'm not trying to waste anyone's time.. Thanks for your response..
     
  5. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    Your Dime looks damaged.
     
    Candice Wise and Evan Saltis like this.
  6. expat

    expat Remember you are unique, just like everyone else Supporter

    This is taken from the NGC site

    The difference is obvious to the naked eye. It is believed (although unconfirmed) that in 1969 and 1970 the mints had a deficit of working reverse dies for Roosevelt dimes and simply made the decision to use surplus reverse dies, which just happened to be the 1968 proof reverse, to continue production.

    Also,
    The correct reverse (RDV-001) features the torch flame in low relief, while the 1968-S reverse (RDV-002 & FS-901) has two deeper valleys in the flame. The difference is obvious to the naked eye.
     
    Candice Wise likes this.
  7. Candice Wise

    Candice Wise Active Member

  8. Danomite

    Danomite What do you say uh-huh

    Candice Wise likes this.
  9. Candice Wise

    Candice Wise Active Member

    Thank you.. I was close.. I have never saw a Lincoln Cent with gold on it before.. So was I right about the reverse??
     
  10. ZoidMeister

    ZoidMeister Hamlet Squire of Tomfoolery . . . . .


    Looks like you've got one . . . . 1st.gif thumb.gif rockon.gif

    Z
     
    Firedideguy and Candice Wise like this.
  11. Candice Wise

    Candice Wise Active Member

    I realize it's the 002.. but is it the reverse of the 1968-S
     
  12. Candice Wise

    Candice Wise Active Member

  13. Danomite

    Danomite What do you say uh-huh

    Yes, it would be the proof reverse of ‘68. That’s RDV-002. The gold color on the obverse is probably dried adhesive. Try soaking the coin in 100% acetone and see if it comes off. Here is a good site to bookmark if you haven’t already.
    http://varietyvista.com/index.htm

     
    Candice Wise likes this.
  14. Firedideguy

    Firedideguy New Member

    When I first heard about the FS-901, I started collecting 1969 through 1980 dimes. I currently have 260 RDV-002 1970's. (even more RDV-001's)

    (at times, working on a toll road had its advantages:happy:)
     
    Candice Wise likes this.
  15. Candice Wise

    Candice Wise Active Member

    Thanks for the replies.. I'm excited!!
     
  16. Fred Weinberg

    Fred Weinberg Well-Known Member

    ....and I apologize for being wrong in my post.

    Given the condition of coin, I just didn't see it.

    .....and, I'm not a Die Variety guy, so I should
    have just kept my mouth shut....

    Sorry....
     
    Candice Wise and expat like this.
  17. Candice Wise

    Candice Wise Active Member

    Awe.. Thanks.. Apology accepted.. We all Make mistakes.. I do on here all the time.. Lol.. Very thoughtful of you Fred.. Not a problem.. TY
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page