very strange dime

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by JonySky, Mar 30, 2006.

  1. jazzcoins

    jazzcoins New Member

    This was not done by any machine in the dryer it would not be that conformed and round don't make sense to me. This was done by human hands

    jazzcoins Joe;)
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. elaine 1970

    elaine 1970 material girl

    2008 dime?

    save the 2008 dimes. which might be good. few mintage.
     
  4. davidh

    davidh soloist gnomic

    There is no reason that a coin in a dryer would suffer deformation of the rim only. The damage is overall.

    This is a dryer coin
    [​IMG]

    This is a "spooned" coin
    [​IMG]
     
  5. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    The cent has potentially been in the dryer longer, and coppernickel is harder and more resistant to marks than the copper cent. It will alo depend on what else is in the dryer fin with the coin. If the coin is basicly by itself you won't get the fields all marked up. If you have sand, other coins, other small hard objects like nuts, screws, small rocks etc the fields will get badly marked up. So a marked up piece is definitely from a dryer, but you can't say an unmarked up one isn't.
     
  6. davidh

    davidh soloist gnomic

    I can say it. Look at dimes from your pocket change and you'll see they're marked up and nicked. Now, if a dime undergoes enough accidental trauma to fold the rim over, it WILL show more than a little damage and/or marks and scrapes on the portrait and fields, whether it's hard nickel, soft gold or anything in between.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page