Better pictures of the 1896 PL that caused much debate.

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Morgandude11, Jun 26, 2020.

  1. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Ok, this was a difficult coin to capture. These were daylight shots, at an angle. If it got tense, sorry for any nastiness. Been in a mood, because of family issues. Looking at these photos, it looks like a different coin. 14AAF4C4-6CD5-48A0-840F-FBAABED95046.jpeg DEA9C968-67DF-49F6-8B3A-E2E6E2FE22E5.jpeg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. BlackberryPie

    BlackberryPie I like pie

    You haven't seen nastiness until you've seen me without food.
     
    robec and Morgandude11 like this.
  4. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    That looks like a different coin and how can it be a 62? It should be higher. If you want to nasty, visit my ex mother in law.
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  5. CoinDoctorYT

    CoinDoctorYT Well-Known Member

    that looks polished not Pl. Maybe just the angle of the pics
     
  6. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    This was a daylight shot, near the window, with my Nikon on a tripod. See why I think minor little problems resulted in a grade that I think is 1-2 grades low? I guess I am not completely crazy.
     
    Collecting Nut likes this.
  7. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    That is the look of a classic PL coin.
     
  8. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    That’s really a nice coin!
     
  9. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    Nice coin, I agree, but I still see the marks on the cheek and the stuff in front of the face and behind the head, not to mention the rim. Enough to knock it down a couple of grades...apparently!
     
  10. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I think it's 1-2 points low as well. I've seen worse 64's.
     
  11. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    I own worse 65s.
     
  12. messydesk

    messydesk Well-Known Member

    I'd really have to see the surfaces of the obverse better to be able to comment on the grade. 62PL seems plausible.
     
  13. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I can believe that. Someone must have had a migraine when they graded this coin a 62.
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  14. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    It is my lowest graded Morgan I own, except for the 1893s at AU 50. I have hundreds of Morgans—no way this is a 62. I have 64s and 65s that are as clean. Yes, I acknowledge there are a few bag marks, and some die polish lines in the obverse rear fields, but not enough for a 62. That was my point of the OP. Is it gem? Not likely, but 63 or 64PL? Sure.
     
    Collecting Nut likes this.
  15. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    Maybe you should crack and resubmit. Also, there's the green bean as is. It should be a 64. I'd rather lose the PL and have a higher grade.
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  16. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    I have a subset of PL coins, and needed that date, so I would rather have the PL. May resubmit or try for cross at specific grade with PCGS.
     
  17. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    If you do, best wishes.
     
  18. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    I probably won’t, as it is an attractive coin, and it isn’t the only one I have that is probably undergraded.
     
  19. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I understand.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page