GTG: Another 1884o

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Morgandude11, Jun 24, 2020.

?

Grade and/or designation

  1. 63

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. 64

    6 vote(s)
    46.2%
  3. 65

    5 vote(s)
    38.5%
  4. 66

    2 vote(s)
    15.4%
  5. 67

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. +

    2 vote(s)
    15.4%
  7. CAC

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

  4. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    I'm going MS65, I think those are luster grazes, not marks on the cheek.
     
  5. LA_Geezer

    LA_Geezer Well-Known Member

    I relented then gave it a 64 instead of 63. I'm still learning, and I learned plenty on the '82-S. Comparing my NGC MS63 to that one, I got a very good deal.
     
  6. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    I'm guessing 66 (assuming that the cheek and left field is clean)
     
  7. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    I should have said that it has pale golden toning on the obverse, that does not photograph well at all.
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  8. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    I'm at MS65+ on this one. It looks really clean and nice. I didn't make a guess on the CAC part. I think it would CAC but I don't know if it has been submitted or not.

    The toning makes it really hard to get a good look at the fields in the photos. It might go 66 but I'm content at 65+
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  9. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    I forgot one category—AU 58 for Doug.
     
  10. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    Quick...maybe you can still edit it.
     
  11. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    I'll go with 64, I have to practice to learn.
     
  12. medoraman

    medoraman Supporter! Supporter

    I wish I had a better closeup of the obverse. It appears to me something on the face, but cannot see well. The reverse is a good 65/66, but obverse carries more weight in grading these. If the "line" I see across her nose and cheek aren't there, I would go with 65+ or 66.
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  13. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    I don’t know if you saw earlier, but the devices on the obverse and the top fields have golden toning.
     
  14. medoraman

    medoraman Supporter! Supporter

    I saw that, and see the gold. I am talking about a dark streak cutting across her lower nose and middle of her cheek. Could very well be on plastic or in the photo.

    Pretty coin, traditional coin folder toning. If the mark I see is not there or is a light scuff, I stand by my guess of 65+ or 66, and very well CAC. Its nice. If I could see it in hand, you might convince me 66+.
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  15. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    That gets a best answer, even though I am not quite ready to reveal yet.

    Last call before reveal
     
    Last edited: Jun 24, 2020
  16. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

  17. medoraman

    medoraman Supporter! Supporter

    Morgandude11 likes this.
  18. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Thanks so much. I admit to being a pretty bad coin photographer. I asked for help, after all these years, now that I have lots of time at home.
     
  19. COOPER12

    COOPER12 Well-Known Member

    nice coin
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  20. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    I was at 64 but had an awful time with the images
     
  21. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    Lovely coin. I was close on this one!
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page