1979-S Jefferson

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by sketcherpbr, Nov 12, 2008.

  1. sketcherpbr

    sketcherpbr Enthusiast

    Just got this one in the mail, was wondering my friends over in Cointalk would think of it! Tell me what you think it should be graded, and I'll tell you what it was graded!

    Go easy on the picture-quality bashing, this is as good as it gets (and indeed, I'm quite impressed with myself on how well they turned out)! :hail:
    The little dust-bumpy things on the obverse are on the slab, not the coin, so maybe that'll help you with your guess = )

    Thanks!
    Peter
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    I need to see the steps and windows but it seems to be OFF center, DCAM, I see one hit on the field behind Jefferson, maybe PF 67

    Ruben
     
  4. borgovan

    borgovan Supporter**

    1979-S, type I, PR-69 DCAM (could be PR-68 because of the black spot on the obverse) in an NGC holder.
     
  5. sketcherpbr

    sketcherpbr Enthusiast

    getting pretty specific!! i'll let it out of the bag after a few more guesses = )
     
  6. rld14

    rld14 Custom User Title

    Is it just me or did the rim take a hit just north of 3:00 on the reverse?
     
  7. sketcherpbr

    sketcherpbr Enthusiast

    I can't really tell what that is on the rim, it's so tiny! It could be anything = \
     
  8. rld14

    rld14 Custom User Title

    To me it looks like a hit, from what I am seeing it appears that the rim is dinged in towards the design, from here it looks like you can see the luster kind of "curve in" just at the top of the damage.

    Could also be a shadow too!
     
  9. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

  10. ikes4ever

    ikes4ever Senior Member

    PF-69
    that coin is off center for sure
     
  11. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    I don't think a 69 can be off center..

    Ruben
     
  12. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    It's not off center. It's the angle of the pic. The upper edge of the holder blocks the bottom portion of the rim.
     
  13. sketcherpbr

    sketcherpbr Enthusiast


    yeah, sorry I didn't clarify that, it's just the angle.

    Allright, I guess I can reveal that it is (as borgovan so astutely said) a type I, DCAM, but it's in a National Numismatic Certification slab as a PR-70. I know, I know, go figure. The real reason that I posted this, I suppose, was to see what you guys think it SHOULD be, not what it is. 'Cause I know these things are overgraded every day....
     
  14. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    By that company, yeah, to say the least.
     
  15. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    NNC grader below

    [​IMG]
     
  16. nickelman

    nickelman Coin Hoarder

    LOL! You forgot the incentive for the poor fella to overgrade because it would be obvious to even a chimp they overgrade!
    Proof-68 = shock
    Proof 70 = No Shock
    Your Pick!
     

    Attached Files:

  17. Pocket Change

    Pocket Change Coin Collector

    I think you're sticking your hands into a bag of bad bananas.

    It has been clinically proven that a monkey, given a typewriter, cannot consistently type: PF70 a thousand times in a row.
     
  18. sketcherpbr

    sketcherpbr Enthusiast

    rofl!!

    "It Puts The Pr:70 On The Slab Or It Gets The Shock!!" :eek:
     
  19. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Pavlov's Chimp
     
  20. jazzcoins

    jazzcoins New Member

    that is a misaligned die without a doubt and off about 5 percent. look at the upper rim on the obverse it appears to be doubled. i have one like thi s and it does'nt mater if it's a proof these errors occur on them also. i just don;t know why the grading company didn;t see it maybe because it's a minor alignment

    Jazzcoins joe:whistle:
     
  21. nickelman

    nickelman Coin Hoarder

    Unfortunately it is the unaware consumer that normally gets the SHOCK when it is discovered the PF70 coin they paid $$ for is at very best a 69 but most likely even lower.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page