GTG: 1954 Jefferson

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Morgandude11, Jun 17, 2020.

  1. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    EDF39A07-CD51-482C-857A-5E4A4BE764D4.jpeg A92DE145-03B6-4E58-8278-B97B847545C6.jpeg Here ya go....
     
    Last edited: Jun 17, 2020
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. toned_morgan

    toned_morgan Toning Lover

    I'm going to throw in a PR69 to start it off!
     
  4. ddddd

    ddddd Member

  5. kSigSteve

    kSigSteve Active Member

    Fixed it for you. I am at 68. Not quite CAM enough.

    7A02E7C0-4B0E-4069-AF3F-82D8122E61F3.jpeg

    69BB97A9-DF1F-4C9C-9E8B-3FBAFED52B71.jpeg
     
    thomas mozzillo likes this.
  6. medoraman

    medoraman Supporter! Supporter

    I don't see why its not a PF69.
     
  7. SorenCoins

    SorenCoins Well-Known Member

    I also agree with PF68 no CAM.
     
  8. Mojavedave

    Mojavedave Senior Member

    I'm not into nickels, but that is a sharp proof 68+.
     
  9. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

  10. medoraman

    medoraman Supporter! Supporter

    Wow, I guess I am out of line if Lehigh thinks a 67.
     
  11. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Not necessarily. This one is pretty nice.

    CFB817CE-4661-4F3A-8DA2-F0859268D20A.jpeg
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  12. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    nah, it’s impossible to grade proofs from photos, thought I saw some haze on obverse
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  13. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Absolutely. This one is nice and clean. Photos don’t do most proofs any justice.
     
  14. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    I do think you picked up on the fact that the reverse is probably Cam, and the obverse is not close.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page