09 vdb bonanza

Discussion in 'What's it Worth' started by johnny54321, Nov 11, 2008.

  1. johnny54321

    johnny54321 aspiring numismatist

    Here are my two 1909 vdbs. One for my Lincoln Dansco album, and the other for my 70/70 type Dansco album. Both are chalk full of luster. The second one has some rainbow toning that isn't very visible. Grade away!
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. snaz

    snaz Registry fever

    Wow john! that second 09 is killer! very nice, ill post mine when i get home. its in my album if your imserested in looking now
     
  4. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    Nice and nice photo's
     
  5. Phoenix21

    Phoenix21 Well-Known Member

    Nice coins! I'll say AU-58 on the first, and possibly MS-65 on the second? The reverse looks cleaned to me from the pic, but I'd say it is just the pic?

    Phoenix :cool:
     
  6. Captainkirk

    Captainkirk 73 Buick Riviera owner

    The first- 59, because of the hair
    the second - 65** a dream coin.
     
  7. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    That first is AU, but that die scratch on the left wheat is interesting.

    That second is what coins are supposed to look like. I would not be the least surprised if it made a 66.
     
  8. Captainkirk

    Captainkirk 73 Buick Riviera owner

    Look at the bottom of it, it hangs over the rim.- a hair.
     
  9. johnny54321

    johnny54321 aspiring numismatist

    Thanks guys. Yes, that is a hair on the first vdb. Feel free all to post your vdbs as well.

    I purchased the second one on ebay for $25 about six months ago. I mainly bought it for the beautiful toning that isn't nearly as evident in my pictures. In hand, there are a variety of gold/green/blue and some reddish brown throught the coin. I'm partial to toned coins for my type set. I honestly didn't realize that it graded so high; but here was the original pic that shows the actual color more accurately. So, it would probably receive a RB designation? I'm fairly certain its not cleaned as there is strong cartwheel luster on both sides.
     

    Attached Files:

  10. snaz

    snaz Registry fever

    I would agree RLM except for the rim nicks on the obverse, theres a few too many IMO. Thats unbelievable Johnny!
    BEAUTIFUL
     
  11. johnny54321

    johnny54321 aspiring numismatist

    Yeah, there are the rim nicks and a few tiny scratches. One by Lincolns nose, and one by the date and one above the N on the reverse under my 30x loupe. However, these aren't visible unless you have the light angled correctly. I would be more than pleased with a 64 grade for what I paid.:hail:

    Are you going to post yours snaz?
     
  12. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    since you asked...

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  13. johnny54321

    johnny54321 aspiring numismatist

    nice mrbrklyn! The reverse is a bit fuzzy, but I'm going to take a guess. AU-53?
     
  14. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    really? I wouldn't have guessed that..

    Ruben
     
  15. snaz

    snaz Registry fever

    sure thing
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  16. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    65's, 66's, or even 67's are not necessarily mark free coins. And nothing anywhere says that even an MS70 is mark free with a 30X loupe. When that MS69 1919- Lincoln was posted, we could see nicks on it. Luster, eye appeals and strike are also part (most) of the grade.
     
  17. johnny54321

    johnny54321 aspiring numismatist

    good to know. no argument from me. It scores a 70 in the eye appeal department imo.

    I really can't tell from the pics, it was a shot in the dark. Since you own the coin, what would your guess be? :)
     
  18. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    VG

    ruben
     
  19. snaz

    snaz Registry fever

    not a chance. Definitly a VF at LEAST
     
  20. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    it looks like an average cent in my pocket...

    Ruben
     
  21. johnny54321

    johnny54321 aspiring numismatist

    woah!! If that is a vg, someone used a lot of photoshop in my opinion...lol. Granted, I can't really make out the reverse but the obverse "appears" to have very little wear.

    Speaking of VG vdbs, however' here is my third and final vdb that I forgot to post. Not nearly as nice as the others, but this one is very special since I found it in circulation. I'm sure it came out of someone's collection(it would be raw planchett like if it had been circulation for 100 years); but it is the highlight of my "circulated" finds.:)
     

    Attached Files:

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page