I’m still a fan of yours, Mike, being able to respectfully disagree use to be a benchmark quality of this Nation. I’m just going to continue to stick with tradition!
Right. This summers FUN show would be CRAZY to go to, but January is ok. What, is the virus going to the Alps for the Winter?
Not exactly . . . let's talk apples and apples, not apples and oranges. I'm not addressing Nate's need to get in his car and make local trips out of necessity. That would be an orange. I'm addressing his statements that, "I have zero concerns about the virus. And before anyone feels the need for a lecture, I’m an American. It’s my right to be concerned or not at my own discretion." To make a local trip is entirely different than going out of one's way, and jeopardizing the welfare of others in the process. Just like Nate, I have parents over a thousand miles away, and called off plans to visit them this spring. Likewise, they are calling off plans to visit us this summer. Those are the apples. And why did we make those choices? Not so much because we fear for our own lives . . . we know the odds are in our favor, and we'd almost certainly be fine if we made the trips in both directions. The reason we made those choices is because we believe in the increased benefits a coordinated effort may deliver toward tackling this virus. It's because once a few are observed defiantly flaunting their indifference, more will follow, and eventually the effectiveness of the collective action breaks down, and the virus really begins to thrive again. I don't care to try and change Nate's mind, but I prefer not to see him stick out his chest and proclaim his fearlessness to a world which would benefit more from less bravado.
Not to worry Nate . . . it still is . . . no respect lost on this end either. We all have differences of one kind or another. That's what makes us human.
Two hypotheses: - assume that once you contract it, you're somewhat immune to it (for a time). If many people have recovered, there is a herd immunity built into the population that reduces the chance of spread. Since this is a new virus, there is currently no herd immunity. It takes time. Perhaps by January, there will be enough herd immunity to reduce the severity of spread/outbreaks. There's a lot of ifs here, of course, but it's been observed in other viruses. - assume that within 6-9 months there will be a vaccine. Based on the billions in research and fast-track lanes these developmental vaccines are receiving, that's not completely impossible. The vaccine might not be widespread by January, but I'd expect that vaccines would be approved and started implementing before Christmas. If you accept either of these hypotheses as remotely plausible, then a January FUN show might be possible. I'm going to choose to believe it will happen.
I'm already registered for the January FUN Show, and am eager to be there, as long as the virus is well under control.
Since I am one of those "old koots" who is of the age that the virus likes to kill, I'll have to see how things play out.
I usually have my trip booked about now for the January show. I'll probably wait till July and see how things look. The airlines will give me credit towards a future flight. Not sure about the hotel. They may charge me for one night. I would be good with that. Still lots of time to figure it all out. I feel sad for all the dealers out there. Shows are important and drive the business. They have much more to deal with and worry over. About all I have to do is show up and have fun.
Book the hotel. Even in non pandemic times, if the hotel charged you for a night when you didn't stay, all you needed to do was dispute the charge with your CC company and they'd reverse the charge. In these times I'd imagine it would be even less of a hassle.
I've stayed out of all these discussions up to now. But ya know, this virus isn't just going to "go away". Even if they get a vaccine it's still not gonna away, not for many, many years. They've got vaccines for all kinds of diseases, but the diseases still exist, they're still out there. And besides that the vaccines don't work for everybody. And then of course there's those who even though they get a disease, and recover, they still get it again. Me for example, I had chicken pox twice, my son had the measles twice - and he was vaccinated against it before he ever got it the 1st time ! This virus is closer to being like the flu than most others diseases like measles or chicken pox or whatever. And they've had flu vaccines for decades, but people still get the flu every year and many people have had the flu many, many times - and they'll get it again. And the flu still kills 60,000-100,000 people a year in this country - every year. My point is, by Jan. 2021, or even 2025 - covid-19 is still gonna be out there, and people are still gonna be getting it - because it aint gonna just go away. And for those that are 65 or + and or have underlying conditions - the risk is still gonna be there for us all. Now the numbers of those who get it may not be as high - but it's still gonna be there.
You're right Doug, but the difference is that, as the size of the population threatened by the virus diminishes, our focus on it will diminish as well. In a couple of years time, COVID-19 will have taken most of its victims. There will be more after that, surely, but fewer and further between. We will become desensitized, focusing more on other worries, and society will open up again . . . completely, just as it did after past pandemics. And someday in the future when we are once again as carefree and unconcerned as we were last year, again another pandemic will hit us . . . and so it goes.
There is one thing good about all of this. Folks have learned a lot about how to be safe. Stuff we have never thought much about in the past. More will practice safety in the future.
Oh I agree that people will get used to it being around Mike just like they are with the flu. And probably not worry about it as much. But my point is it's still going to kill a hundred thousand or so every year just like the flu does and always has.
Everything you said here is 100% correct...but its not complete. The issue with COVID-19 right now is that its a new virus that we have no population immunity for. That's not the case for the seasonal flu. Yes, every so often a flu recombines and we see novel flu...it last happened in 2009...but that's not an every year. We need some immunity throughout the population to lessen the impact of this virus. That will slow the spread. But, its a chicken and egg problem. The measures that are being put in place are an attempt (and who knows how successful they really are) to simply reduce the rate of the spread in the hopes of not overwhelming the healthcare system while at the same time build some of that herd immunity. I believe that had we not globally put the measures into place...we would see this herd immunity and equilibrium come a lot faster, but the death toll would be far higher. What's the value of those lives...I guess that's the unanswerable question. I'm assuming that this summer is shot...and I'm hoping that fall is totally trashed but I assume it will be. But, I would think by January we should have enough population immunity where some kind of equilibrium would be reached.
It is, problem is you should be concerned about what the show would be like. If everyone else is concerned and saying no you very well could be walking into a basically empty room or bare bones cases aka a waste of time
There's actually a third one which is probably the most realistic which is there's just very effective treatment for it by then. If you have treatment it really doesn't matter if someone gets it. Once that happens things will get back to normal very quickly
For all that COVID-19 is horrid and deadly, it's not (yet) on the same scale as the past flu pandemics. The 1968 flu pandemic killed 100,000 in the US / 1,000,000 world wide (https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/1968-pandemic.html) out of a world population a little over 3.5 billion. Against today's 7.8 billion population that's roughly 200,000 / 2,000,000 million. When the flu returned in 1969, it was a much weaker strain. We haven't seen any such indications for SARS-CoV-2. In 1918, with a world population around 1.7B with 675,000 deaths in the US and 50,000,000 worldwide (https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/1918-pandemic-h1n1.html) in three waves (Spring 1918, Fall 1918 and Late Winter 1919 (although don't forget that between the "end" of the 2nd wave in November 1918 and the start of the 3rd wave in February 1919, plenty of people died (including my great grandfather in December). Against today's 7.8B that's equivalent to 2.7M US and 200M world-wide. Again, when the flu returned in the fall of 1919 it was weaker.
While most people are scared out of their minds right now, it's not to not ask the bigger question of where do we finally say the preventive measures are doing much more harm than good? We can be smart about things and not destroy the world at the same time and it's almost impossible right now to not say we haven't done more harm than good with the millions and millions of people who are ignoring everything else and not getting proper health care all because of this. Certain things like shields probably should have always been in place at registers given the flu and things like that are a huge issue every year, but besides the metal health aspects there are a lot more things that kill people every year being significantly ignored right now