Q. about 1932 Eagle

Discussion in 'What's it Worth' started by seabrook, Oct 28, 2008.

  1. seabrook

    seabrook Junior Member

    I'm mostly concerned about the reverse side. The eagle's front breast may have come in contact with some other foreign metal because there's a greyish color visible or can this happen through toning? Estimated rating on coin? TIA.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. HandsomeToad

    HandsomeToad Urinist

    I'd say AU-53, due to what appears to be slight wear on the wing and as to the discolorization, I can't see it in the pic. :kewl: When you post a different pic, I'll look again. ;)

    Ribbit :)

    Ps: Welcome to CoinTalk! :hail:
     
  4. FreakyGarrettC

    FreakyGarrettC Wise young snail

    I dont know but if you don't like it I will take it. :D Just kidding. Maybe one of the more experienced members will come by.
     
  5. seabrook

    seabrook Junior Member

    Better photos uploaded.
     
  6. HandsomeToad

    HandsomeToad Urinist

    I'd say someone had this in a bezel and wore it. The wings show heavy wear but that's the bulk of the wear, I can't see any on the obverse so the reverse rubbed against the person wearing it.

    Take a little ammonia and soak it in it to remove the gunk but be careful not to scratch it when drying it. Don't rub it, dab it. ;)

    Ribbit :)
     
  7. FreakyGarrettC

    FreakyGarrettC Wise young snail

    Toad you would touch a gold coin with a rag with ammonia on it?!? I wouldn't do that with a ten foot pole. I think that needs to happen to it but I would die if that was my coin and I screwed it up. :cool:
     
  8. cherylkubucko

    cherylkubucko Grandma Froggie

    VERY NICE coin, Cheryl
     
  9. seabrook

    seabrook Junior Member

    Ok, I'll now reveal that this coin has been graded MS62 by PCGS.

    What I don't understand is how this coin could earn such a grade with such obvious wear on the reverse side??
     

    Attached Files:

  10. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    If you spend a few days reading the threads on the forum regarding the subject - you soon will understand. They over-graded the coin.
     
  11. HandsomeToad

    HandsomeToad Urinist

    Ammonia is good for cleaning gold but you don't want to wipe it afterwards. I've used ammonia for 20 years to clean gold and also, Tarn-X works good to dip gold, especially if it has a tad bit of green on it but like I said, never wipe, dab. ;)

    Ribbit :)
     
  12. HandsomeToad

    HandsomeToad Urinist

    I wonder if there were weak strikes of these or a worn die? The luster does look MS but the only way to know for sure is to have it in hand. That's the problem with pics, you cannot properly grade by a pic alone, which is like the old saying - Many cannot live on bread alone - in this case - Man cannot grade by pic alone. :D

    Ribbit :)
     
  13. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    That is true to an extant Toad. However, while you can never tell for sure from a pic that a coin is genuine - there are cases where you can tell with certainty that it Is Not genuine from a pic.

    Same kind of thing with grading. While you may not be able to grade definitively from a pic - you can from pic tell if a coin has wear or not.
     
  14. gopher29

    gopher29 Coin Hoarder

    Maybe PCGS thinks the coin is just a weak strike. But it does look like wear on the eagle's body.
     
  15. FreakyGarrettC

    FreakyGarrettC Wise young snail

    I like bread but that is true that a man cant live off of it. Eventually it would go stale. :D :eating: [​IMG]
     
  16. seabrook

    seabrook Junior Member

  17. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I'm doubting if it's even real.
     
  18. FreakyGarrettC

    FreakyGarrettC Wise young snail

    Im thinking it's photoshoped.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page