How To Get Rid of Red Spots on Gold, Easy and Cheap

Discussion in 'World Coins' started by 7Jags, Apr 25, 2020.

  1. 7Jags

    7Jags Well-Known Member

    Those are exactly the orange spots on your Albanian coin. This is a VERY mild electrolytic reaction, so no "boiling" of metal. I think the apparent marks on the Anguilla coin are my poor photography as it does not look like metal destruction at all in hand. This is quite a small coin. In fact the orange spot was at the intersection of the shield and tree, and this did nicely. I will try for some more pictures tonight of this coin.
    I will do some others as well tonight, including the 22kt (.916) Isle of Man Viking coins.

    Here is one other picture of the obv. of the Anguilla and a blowup of the affected area:
    fullsizeoutput_1901.jpeg
    fullsizeoutput_18fe.jpeg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Stork

    Stork I deliver

    Thankfully not my coin :). Just one I saw in an auction and kept photos of out of curiosity. Mine is a lower grade, but higher eye appeal IMO. I've asked about it before (@Insider gave some excellent input) but I'm always curious to hear what others have to say.
     
    panzerman likes this.
  4. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    This is relevant to my interests, as I have a gold Kennedy with one or two copper spots. I've talked about using it as a pocket piece so that I can have the lowest-graded gold Kennedy in existence, but I don't think I could bring myself to do it. :rolleyes:

    I'm assuming that "copper spots" in general don't get their color from copper metal, but from copper oxide. If that's the case, either electrolytic or acid treatments should remove the color. High-fineness gold (.999) shouldn't be affected by either one, although I'd be nervous about physical marks from just resting a proof coin on aluminum foil, never mind any chemical activity.

    I remember stripping oxide off copper wire by heating it and then hanging it over hot methanol. You get a smell of formaldehyde and a bright copper wire. I thought about using the same technique on coins, but I'm not sure exactly how hot you have to get the metal, and I'm not comfortable heating coins that much. I also don't know that this vapor-phase approach would have any advantages over liquid soaks. It might be nice to "fix" a coin that's browned in its slab, but I'm pretty sure you'd need temperatures that would melt the plastic.
     
    green18 and panzerman like this.
  5. 7Jags

    7Jags Well-Known Member

    Please use the above method. Hell, if you were in the DC area I would do it for you. It really works VERY WELL, it will not mark from just resting on the aluminum. I won't tell you that I am a physician and was trained in biology and chemistry at Stanford University.
     
  6. Stork

    Stork I deliver

    @7Jags Have you ever handled a details slab that was labeled 'spots removed'? I've seen them online, but never in hand and curious what was visible that got the details grade.

    This coin is actually mine, not one I've thought to have a the spot removed on, as it's not a huge distraction, smaller and near the rim above the horse's brow.

    combo e3e3e3.jpg



    Now here's something all nice without any red spots ;) Stanford. So, I've got to ask...what specialty? You can probably guess mine.

    Cal.jpg
     
    Pickin and Grinin and panzerman like this.
  7. 7Jags

    7Jags Well-Known Member

    Yes, I have seen the spot removal "tag", but not on anything of mine. Confidentially I have done alright just following basic protocol. I did have an issue on a coin I used a battery for electrolysis, and too much of a good thing is just that...
    This method, no problems.


    Ortho

    Go Weenies! LOL
    Nowadays that you have any attachment to California gives you a plus in my book!
     
  8. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    physics-fan3.14, posted: "Very curious as to your thoughts on this. Is this how NCS does it? (I understand if its "classified").

    NO

    Any thoughts on the potential for harming coins with this method?

    I've never tried it but it seems to work. I can see the coin may get hairlined if not careful drying it.
     
    Stork and RonSanderson like this.
  9. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    Stork, asked: "Have you ever handled a details slab that was labeled 'spots removed'? I've seen them online, but never in hand and curious what was visible that got the details grade."

    A "spot removal" label indicates someone has scratched up a tiny area on a coin in an attempt to remove something. Taken copper spots off gold leaves no trace 99.9% of the time.
     
  10. 7Jags

    7Jags Well-Known Member

    Here are some more pictures:

    First is Singapore 1988 100 Singold, orange on dragon body and a bunch of miscellaneous on the obverse. Same treatment as the above. 0.999 fine

    Before:

    fullsizeoutput_1917.jpeg fullsizeoutput_1911.jpeg


    After:

    qsmcDbaDRKytkAVSDe+eFA.jpg fullsizeoutput_1923.jpeg

    Not perfect, but IMO a lot better.
     
    Seattlite86 likes this.
  11. 7Jags

    7Jags Well-Known Member

    Here is another relative success of a 1987 Britannia, obverse only:

    There is a mark in the second curl wave in hair above ear

    fullsizeoutput_1914.jpeg

    After:

    fullsizeoutput_1920.jpeg

    BTW, in hand all the seeming blemishes are not bad and it is a beautiful coin even if not a "70"
     
    Seattlite86 likes this.
  12. 7Jags

    7Jags Well-Known Member

    Now here are some not so successful Isle of Man Sovereigns, allegedly same alloy as above Britannia and before and after -

    One Sovereign 1975

    fullsizeoutput_191a.jpeg

    fullsizeoutput_192a.jpeg


    1977 5 Sovereigns, before:


    fullsizeoutput_190e.jpeg


    And after:

    fullsizeoutput_1927.jpeg

    I am wondering if there is another alloy that has oxidized besides copper? I tried a second processing and no difference.
    I think I will still do my other IOM, but realize that they have had the worst results. Any ideas or commentary?
     
    Seattlite86 and Insider like this.
  13. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    I think the difference here is the first ones have been very light surface stains. These two coins have spots which are much deeper and more toned. It appears that they are corroded.
     
  14. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    HOW REFRESHING. It is a rare person who will admit to "fails." This result would not go over at a TPGS Conservation Service. That may be the reason this method is not used to the best of my knowledge. Nevertheless, whomever was the first to discover what you have shown is a genius.

    Before conservation is attempted (only at some places) the spot is examined under a microscope. Many of these spots result from a tiny piece of imbedded debris. When the color is removed the debris remains. If not, their is a depression in the surface where it was.
     
    green18, Some Aussie and Seattlite86 like this.
  15. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    Out of curiosity ( which can be dangerous), and if it is not a professional secret @Insider, can you describe what 'tool' might be used :) Jim
     
  16. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    No telling. It is not a secret. Metal can be moved on a coin's surface using various tools. It is all covered by the term "tooling." That includes moving metal to smooth out the surface as burnishing or a recent term "smoothing" (to make the act of altering an ancient coin easier to swallow) all the way to "chasing" or digging into it or adding details. Spot removals are done to remove unsightly spots on the surface. Most spot removals are don by ham-fisted, morons who don't know any better. It looks like they use pins or nails - anything sharp and pointed.

    I'll post some images this week.
     
    -jeffB, Seattlite86 and Stork like this.
  17. Seattlite86

    Seattlite86 Outspoken Member

    @7Jags I would be extremely curious to see if a TPG grades these problem free. Should you happen to submit them, please follow up here!
     
    Stork likes this.
  18. 7Jags

    7Jags Well-Known Member

    I may do that for kicks. I will say that the spots do not appear deep under magnification at all and had a much more grey/black appearance and not the red-orange of earlier. I have about 4 more IOM's with the same type of spots. None of my IOMs (and I have a number more as I like the Viking on horseback despite all the disparaging remarks about the design) have the orange spots and were gotten from diverse locations in the USA and Europe.

    So the Anguilla coin is of LESS gold fineness and worked out well.
    The Britannia of equal fineness gold also worked out fairly well.
    Obviously the Singapore of greater fineness did well.

    I'd sure like a XRF or spec. of the surfaces of the IOM coins - none around here unless I want to pay the U. of Maryland $300 per test! Free at "the Farm" but that is 3,000 miles distant. Can anyone supply the info. on that.
     
    Stork and Seattlite86 like this.
  19. 7Jags

    7Jags Well-Known Member

    My IOMs are generally in good nick: fullsizeoutput_1931.jpeg
     
    Seattlite86 likes this.
  20. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    IMO, all the above coins would straight grade if sent in.
    These spots are part of the coin's surface and are technically not "problems." Generally, copper spots will reduce a grade a little. For example, if a coin just makes MS-64 they may drop it to a high MS-63. Copper spots are rarely tolerated on coins over 65. If they are on these coins, it probably developed after the coin was slabbed.

    The idea for NCS was planted when I removed copper spots from a $10 Indian and it was graded higher. A short time later I did another conservation. That got the ball rolling and NCS went from a Janitor's sink room to a state of the art lab.

    "Spot Removals" are a different thing. They are scratch damage to the surface. They can also be seen as abrasive spots where the top layer of metal is removed. This is more commonly seen on copper coins.
     
    Seattlite86 and Stork like this.
  21. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    What I'm looking at might be due to your pictures. But I'm not even looking at the area where you removed the spot, I'm looking elsewhere on the coin. For example, this is screen shot of your original pic -

    upload_2020-4-28_10-21-56.png


    Now look at the surfaces around the top and both sides of the dolphin. The surfaces look nice and smooth don't they - all the way to the tree and all the way to the beads.

    This is a screen shot of your most recent after pic of the same area -

    upload_2020-4-28_10-24-18.png


    (saw the same things in the 1st after pic too)

    upload_2020-4-28_10-33-10.png


    The surfaces are no longer nice and smooth above and to both sides of the dolphin. Now we see ridges and bumps that were not in the before pic.

    Now could that be the effects of lighting ? It might, I've seen different pics of the same coin have completely different colors many times. But the texture of the surfaces don't change. And in these pics the surfaces sure look to have changed.

    You can see the same kind of differences to the surfaces of the fields above the RS in dollars in the before and after pics.

    Just my thoughts on what I'm seeing.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page