Richie, I have only been a member of this forum for a little over a month, but that was the best post I have seen yet. Well thought out, beautifully explained, and a great application of numismatic knowledge. Congrats! Paul
It's hard to believe that the 1st coin, with those noticeable bag marks, earned a grade of MS-68. I have a 1996 SAE that PCGS slabbed as MS-68 and it doesn't have any noticeable contact marks.
Somewhere on these boards are pictures of my PCGS 67's, all 3 are 1880/81-S and look very similar to the NGC 68 Paul posted originally, and I can see a 67 easily. Not one of my 67's are near as clean as coin 2 in the pictures, but the lighting seems to hide a few hits on the cheek. I said SEEMS.
cant tell on coin 2, the light blocks half the cheek, but I know it's a nice one, I'll guess a 67 as well
ill go with a Ms-65 also there is great detail, but nothing amazing about the coin. What is the NGC grade?
I have a feeling he could come back if he wanted to , hope he does . But It's just my opinion . Paul was a definite wealth of knowledge on toning and toned coins in general . Rusty
Paul's vacation ended 2 weeks ago. And he has visited the forum more than once in that time. He apparently has chosen not to post however.