Error 1982 w/ 1943 behind it

Off the rails. Ignore mode for me. Bye bye squirrelly. Squirrel

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Lamo. Lol

 

Are you serious? That's your proof? Can you point out the part where he says you have an authentic error? I think Mr. Meier was telling you in a nice way that you don't have anything special

 

Old Hoopster said the same thing wile I was typing. He must be a nice guy.


Meier. Cale ...Hello , Thanks for clarifying.Unfortunately I think this coin is going to be too low value for us to handle. MY....

Which likely means not worth anything ( without saying so) as he knows it can not be. Be glad he doesn't mention it on his Facebook or other account along with your "1944 cent with a 3 behind the 4. So best you let it go and do more reading and studying on coins. Let's move on.

Jim

 

Yes, I think that is proof all right, proof that you are wrong.

 

Pereidolia raises its ugly tail once again. It's a tail, right, not a head.

 

I have never seen images quite like these. They should win a reward.

 

In the past, the mods have told me that it is not nice for me to call someone an idiot. I wonder if I would be out of line if I referred to someone as "numismatically challenged"? ~ Chris

 

That's a more friendly term. I like it.

 

Larry, what makes you think I want to be friends with *Cams great ya know* ?
~ Chris

 

the statement "I think this coin is going to be too low value for us to handle."

is the best politically savvy "get lost" statement ...

 

What mint employee, if he wanted to make a fake overdate, would use a valuable coin like a 1943 copper?

 

Two comments on this coin:

1. Great example of numismatic pareidolia

2. Welcome to my world -

 

Aw c'mon, Fred! Tell us what you really think. ~ Chris

 

I'm also curious what the "My" was ... another sentence perhaps ??

 

"My god, stop contacting me with this garbage"

 

That's like Daniel Carr making a $100 fantasy coin from a $100,000 original

 

Full Obverse.

 

Yeah but???

 

No. Hope you don't argue with us members