Maybe someone can sum this up briefly, since the differences are unique. What is the major difference between coins from the Dept. of the Treasury and the US Mint. Let's also discuss an assay office.
And why does the us mint not need an Assay office? Or a better question would be, why does the treasury need one???
I'll admit that it has been 11 years since I ordered bags & rolls from the US Mint, but if my memory serves me, they were shipped from somewhere in Tennessee. So, what's the difference? Chris
That would take a LONG answer and I don't have the time right now. What is the date stamped on that package? November what?
I'm not really sure what you're wanting to know here. Explaining why you're asking the question would go a long way towards understanding. But if it helps you understand; the parent organization is the US Treasury. The US Mint is a department of the US Treasury, the Bureau of Engraving and Printing is a department of the US Treasury, the US Assay Office is a department of the US Treasury. All three of these departments do different things and have different responsibilities, but they all answer to and are under the jurisdiction of the US Treasury. In a nutshell, the Mint make coins; the BEP prints paper money; the Assay Office assays precious metals, and they accept precious metals from the public so the Mint can turn those metals into coins for them. But that is rarely done anymore. Now beyond that what is it you really want to know ?
Thank you mod. You package that perfectly into a nutshell. Well so the mint makes coins for the treasury basically. The assay office guarantees the metal is correct composition. You can buy coins from either source. Is there a historical advantage or disadvantage of buying from either of the two?
Not sure why you think that. To the best of my knowledge you can't. The only place, that I am aware of at least, that you can actually buy coins is from the US Mint. The Treasury has this on their website - https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/faqs/Coins/Pages/edu_faq_coins_sales.aspx But all links found there for actual sales take you to the US Mint website.
That's why I want to know what the date on the package is. At one time you could order coins directly from the Treasury. I'm wondering if this Assay office address could have been used for shipping back then. No, that can't be it. It shows a zipcode and they weren't in use until around 62 or 63. By then I think all ordering would have been through the mint. I have no idea what the US Assay Office Numismatic services would have been. OK found part of the answer. Apparently orders for coin sets used to be placed through the US Assay Office Numismatic Service. In 1971 the address for orders were placed through an address in San Francisco. Still don't know when the order address was in New York. The date on the package would help narrow it down but I suspect it would be between 1962 and 1968. Possibly earlier as well but the sipcode on the package shown as I said would be after 1962.
I don't know Michael, I can't speak to what you're saying. I can remember ordering from and receiving from the Mint as a kid. But I can't even begin to remember what city I used to have to mail orders to. I can offer these though, pictures that have been posted here over the years. And all 3 show the mint in Philly as being the sender. 1914 Proofs - Two different 1942 Proof sets - Now that doesn't mean that coins couldn't have been ordered direct from the Treasury or the Assay Office, or orders at least be mailed to them. And it doesn't mean that either one couldn't have mailed the coins back to the person who ordered them. All the pics really show for sure is that the Mint sent these out.
Is there a difference in handling depending on the methodology or type of mint product for the same type of issue? Which is the best method for obtaining the highest grade business strikes? I asked these questions when getting into Hungarian moderns, even though they have only one mint. After some searching, I found the answer was actually quite complicated, poorly documented, and it ended up with me buying some obscure mint products for my modern set, and getting NGC to recognize a third strike type for modern Hungarian issues. I don't know the answers to the above for the US mint, but I suspect it may be more complicated than at face.
So, in short, manufacturing and distribution happen at different locations, which also may change in the future. Of course, there are also Coin Terminals/Depots, wholesalers, other secondary retailers and financial institutions.
This is the suspect that has peaked my interest. "Uncirculated Ike - postage paid by Dept. of Treasury"... and he has coin strike distractions.
At first glance I thought it might have been related to the GSA sales, but those started a year later than that is dated. So I can't explain it myself. Conder might be on to something with "assay office being used for shipping" for those particular coins for some reason. I also wonder if maybe the assay office had souvenir order forms in their office. Maybe that might explain it.
For these coins sent out from the Mint, Assay Office, Treasury: They are legal tender from the minute they are STRUCK at the mint, not when issued as souvenirs to collectors or in mint bags for bank distribution, right? In my research on Korean coins, Bank of Korea documents state that unissued currency held in their vaults is "neither an asset nor liability of the Bank of Korea, nor is it included in calculations of issued currency."
@mlov43 in the US I believe is it when they are delivered by the coiner that they become money. Up until they they are counted as bullion by weight.
...not trying to argue...imo, coins actually become money after the Mint has culled out defects and the QA Dept. approves them to be released for packaging and subsequent transport. Spark
Oh! Now I have two versions of when a coins becomes money (at the US Mint): 1) at the moment it is struck 2) after inspection/release by "coiner"