Previously unrecognized (by Numista and NGC) Small Date Variety found. This 5 Centavos Peru type series runs from 1945 to 1965 Numista and NGC acknowledge Small Date/Large Date Varieties for 1957, 1960, and 1965 in the series. An Overdate Variety is acknowledged by Numista for 1964 but not a Small Date/Large Date Variety. https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces1022.html https://www.ngccoin.com/price-guide...-km-223.2-1951-1965-cuid-1097412-duid-1546448 The coin I present here appears to be an Overdate Small Date Variety for 1964 combined with a Die Clash.
@Pete Apple Didn't you post the image of the 1964 Large Date once before? I believe I thought the "4" was larger than the other digits. Chris
Didn't you post the image of the 1964 Large Date once before? I believe I thought the "4" was larger than the other digits. Chris[/QUOTE] Yes I did. Good memory. The "4" is mentioned here: https://www.coinworld.com/news/precious-metals/ham-handed-updates-collectors-clearinghouse.html I have found no reference to this small date variety nor have I found another example. I would like to hear from anyone who is aware of either! I have several of the 1964 issue with enough evidence to say that the date numbers are hand punched individually. This one shows evidence of repunching:
You're close-up certainly makes it look like it is a Small Date variety when compared to the Large Date. How would you get such a variety authenticated? Chris
That was my first reaction too, but after looking at images of a few others from the series, it looks like the digits were always rough.
I did show these photos to Mike D. and just heard back from him the following: "Hi Pete. You are correct on all counts. I suspect there are other unrecognized repunched dates, overdates, and misplaced dates among Peruvian issues produced during this time period. Cheers, Mike"