Guess the Grade Morgan Toner

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by ddddd, Aug 17, 2019.

?

What do you think is the grade?

Poll closed Aug 20, 2019.
  1. 61/61+

    3.7%
  2. 62/62+

    18.5%
  3. 63

    25.9%
  4. 63+

    40.7%
  5. 64

    11.1%
  6. 64+

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  7. 65

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. 65+

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  9. 66

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  10. 66+

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    Please guess and use the poll. :)

    Note: I didn't have enough room, so a few of the possibilities were combined onto one line.

    0000071180065135109812_rev.jpg
     
    Johndoe2000$ likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Patrick King

    Patrick King Well-Known Member

    I grade it 63+
    The toning and semi prooflike fields are very attractive, but the obv has too many contact marks for me to call the coin a 64.
     
  4. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    63. I really like the toning. The reverse is close to PL. A fair amount of bagmarks, under the toning, that would limit it to 63. Might be 63+
     
  5. kSigSteve

    kSigSteve Active Member

  6. thomas mozzillo

    thomas mozzillo Well-Known Member

  7. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    There is an MS-63 coin under all that color, but i’m sure if graded higher.
     
  8. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    62 obverse 65 reverse. Nice color. I’m at 63
     
    yakpoo and Morgandude11 like this.
  9. Johndoe2000$

    Johndoe2000$ Well-Known Member

    I went 62+ although I've never actually seen one.
     
  10. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    MS62 but it had to be bumped for the color to get there.
     
  11. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    +1
     
  12. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Pretty much exactly my thought process as well.
     
  13. atcarroll

    atcarroll Well-Known Member

    I'm undecided between 62 and 63, but i bet it got a color bump and the holder says 64
     
  14. Ike Skywalker

    Ike Skywalker Well-Known Member

    +1
     
  15. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    Reveal this evening...
     
  16. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    I’m at 63 obverse and 65 reverse. I’d bet the luster looks fantastic. My personal grade is 63, but since this is a GTG, I guessed 64
     
  17. mullah

    mullah Member

  18. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    Last call...
     
  19. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    This one shocked me; I'm not seeing what PCGS and CAC saw...
    2 point color bump and still a sticker....
    Or are the marks all luster grazes? :confused:

    0000071180065135109812_obv.jpg
     
    Johndoe2000$ and Morgandude11 like this.
  20. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Okay, this is where I pivot and defend the TPG grade at all costs, blaming photos, lack of in hand inspection, marks are magnified etc....


    NOPE, this coin is overgraded by at least one point, possibly 2, or more! That grade is atrocious.
     
  21. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Agreed. The toning is very nice, but I think the obverse is too baggy for a 65+. 64 might have been defensible, with the bump for color, but a 65+? No way.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page