Need Roman ID

I suspected Alexander Severus on obverse of this bronze coin weighing 13.1 g. The reverse shows a male standing, holding scepter with left hand and pathera over altar with right hand. Could you please guess the name of the Emperor on this coin? Thanks.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

I'd bet a button that's a young Caracalla.

 

Looks like Caracalla to me - maybe something like this https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=5189771
Good luck

 

I agree with Finn and Sulla - looks like young Caracalla.

 

Thanks guys. Yes Caracalla from Amaseia- Pontus. It's listed as "very rare".

 

Not to be snarky or anything, but I'd assume most provincials would be very rare since most of them were intended for local trade. There are exceptions, of course--Markianopolis, Antioch, Nicopolis--but when you consider that most cities minted coins of different emperors and with different reverses, and the percentage that are still well-enough preserved to be positively identified after 1500-2000 years, I'd guess that the odds of there being more than 100 or so of any one particular type of Roman provincial coin to be pretty low. Am I off base about this?

 

Not off base at all. There's an old saying about ancient coins that applies particularly to Roman provincials: "Rare coins are common."

 

"Rarity", per se, is one of the most overused concepts in marketing coins. If you say "Rare!" on every coin you list for sale (as I see way too many sellers using it this way), it becomes just like the sellers who always boost their grading at least a whole level in print, too. The use of a posted grade is virtually meaningless in, say, any ebay listing of an ancient or medieval coin - saying it's "rare" is also right up there in the meaningless stratosphere.
People don't buy any but the most important and published coin-types on the basis of rarity. The je ne sais quoi of "eye appeal" is WAY more important in 99+% of sales situations than any empirical combination of technical grade and rarity.
If you wish to make rarity a dimension and parameter of your personal collection, that's fine, but "possibly/probably unique" pieces (particularly among Provincial issues) are almost literally more common than "common" Provincials.

 

Yes, "rare" seems to be a bit commonplace with Roman provincials. I agree that eye appeal is probably a better guarantor of future marketability.

 

..whoever it is ( i don't think its Sev.Alex meself) it's a dang fine lQQkin' portrait coin Charles...