It's definitely different. I call it my blood Morgan because it looks like blood splattered on the left and pooled on the right. I can see how some people might find that unappealing! Lol
Doug is probably pretty close if not right on. The date and mint can make a big difference. I have seen a lot of other date/mint combinations that looked a lot worse make the 65 grade, but for an early S mint? They tend to come too nice so in order to make the grade they have to be really clean.
Absolutely. 1881s and 1882s coins are held to a higher standard, given the high mintages, high survival rates, strong strikes, and abundance of beautiful examples for those dates. Those coins have to “work harder” to get a gem grade, than other common dates.
eBay purchase. There's a seller I've talked to a few times who is a really nice guy. He had this coin up and there were really bad photos. When I looked it up there were true views and and I was instantly all in lol The seller submitted it from an old ICG holder which was marked 66+. (I know, I know it's not a Gem and ICG is bad). I got lucky I snagged it before anyone else did because you rarely see this crimson red on a Morgan!
I found the listing on eBay. I can’t imagine why he didn’t use the TrueView image. He may have left money on the table. I too would have bought it at his asking price. Crimson is rare on any coin. You’ve got something special here. It’s really a unique look because there are no other colors present- just crimson and silver. I really dig the contrast. My favorite color on a Morgan is a deep, iridescent emerald green.
Oh for sure, this is one of two coins I got recently that I wouldn't let go for even 3x what I paid! Love them ha if you ever get an emerald green one you should post it here for sure.
I have an 1887 with lovely green peripheral toning. You can see blue as well in the TrueView image, but in-hand it looks purely green. Then, there's the green color as seen in The Moose Morgan..... Or even the Green Meanie Morgan.....