The blue arrow represents a design not completely removed during that double hubbing.

A Monticello die clash on the reverse of this 1959 Lincoln Cent.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

I can see the quantum flow in this one. Radon in the environment is prejudicial to copper.

 

It’s tricky to the eyes when the highest height left to be seen on the die is what was the height of a design left on the hub. A mirror proof has the same kind of shine as the sharp abrasion was passed over the surface.
These kind of coins have a white looking color in they’re polished effect of reaching a purer point of the metal.

 

But only if the Radon is unquantized.

 

I think you are looking to hard at the polish marks and seeing things in them (like cloud gazing). If your goal is to show people what you are seeing you are going to have to generate some overlays because none of us are seeing what you are seeing.

 

Jim, I'm beginning to think that the OP has a relative who specializes in Rockwell Test specimens.

Chris

 

I almost peed!

 

Don't forget, that first you must make a Quantum Leap to put right, what once went wrong...

 

I-B-I-N

 

.... sure.

 

Now THAT IS FUNNY! Some laugh, others need an explanation.

 

But when you try to verify it isn't , it flips and becomes quantatized. That is how the Lincoln Memorial became Monticello in the example above.

 

All I see on the Cent in question is..
Contrast,
Repetition,
Alignment,
Proximity!

 

I’d like to think it’s a good re-enforcement of an assumed explanation that modifying the hub was intended by seeing the G, then if you think it is, you have the other 4 images seeming to suggest they might not have meet a standard of requirement the first time either.

 

Let me postulate for a brief iota. When one seems to find the exacerbating excremental continuum, would, in fact, the mint becomes a true interloper? Is a more proper definition of what you are elementizing, a more common approach to looking for hubs that span time and reproach?

 

Wilberrrrrrr