These are examples of machine doubling: http://www.error-ref.com/machine-doubling/ Not considered an error or variety, sorry.
and I thought all he wanted to do was confirm that the 1982 was a Large Date and the 1969 was actually a 1969? LOL If you look at the 1969 you can see how "flat" the edges are especially with the "96". It looks like it was Pushed off of itself and is "shelf-like" looking or "flat". You can also see it replicated on the Mint Mark. Date + Mint Mark you should be suspicious as back then MintMarks were repunched by hand. So how could they have the same "doubling" except by die striking movement/deterioration in most cases?
Thanks for the info,im still tryna soak it all in. Those looked rly convincing after seeing trash rolls all day lol,my bad.
"...Thanks for the info,im still tryna soak it all in. Those looked rly convincing after seeing trash rolls all day lol,my bad..." Can this be translated into English, please? Sad