1984 ddo and DDR? Doubled ear?

It looks like there is doubling in some other areas and part of the collar(s) is missing?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

I don't know if it's the photo or not but the lettering and date look like there's something going on. Could you post a clearer photo of both sides of the coin. (The full coin). Thank you.

 

There are no such thing as stupid questions.

 

As far as the double ears. All double ears usually show some form of doubling even on the perimeter devices. If they don't u can usually chop it up to a well placed plating blister, Yes they do follow the details in some circumstances. The problem is usually finding another coin that follows the same look and has the same die characteristics and markers.

 

It looks like there might be a die clash?

 

clashes don't happen on the recesses of the die. They show in the flat surfaces (fields).

 

That's what I'm referring to. The typical type. It looks like the concave inter-pillar bars on the obverse and the outline of lincolns bust on the reverse. But the picture is not clear enough to know for sure.

 

The highest points on a coin are the Lowest point in a die. The flat field is the highest point in a die.

It's not a clashed die

 

Again, I know this. I have brought something NEW to the post.

 

Inside the black circles illustrate the potential clash marks which are standard for a clash. I've stated "potential" AND that it's hard to tell from the pic. But reading comprehension does not appear to be any of the critics strong suits. So, I've had to show a picture for you. I hope that you can comprehend your lack of logical reasoning misunderstsnding(s).

 

Sorry, but you must not understand the term "concave" or its reference because its meaning is concave versus convex, which refer to high and low. Sorry for using words outside your vocabulary. I know that low IQ people think smart people are dumb people because they do not understand them. Its TRUE!

 

It was an early morning pre-coffee response. I looked at the circles and thought you were talking about it being clashed. My bad on that.

However, based on your recent claims about other coins, I understand how I could have thought you were making wild, unsubstantiated claims. But in this instance, it was my mistake

 

@i2i Is this your coin or the one posted by the op @LCober ?