Meow has made a few find CRH. A 1999p Connecticut with very harsh die polish lines behind the branches of the tree. A 2017p Ozark Riverways with the typical DD in the window. And a 1963 d penny with a clash showing where the three is.
The lines in going through the three cast a shadow, just like a die clash form. Meow cant think of what else would leave that curved line that seems to have slight differences in elevation on each side.
Meow can see a extra brick in the top left. It shows in both photos. Is that not what the DD for this quarter is supposed to look like?
I think the point about it not being a die clash is important. Usually when @paddyman98 responds in the way he did here, there is something for me to learn. My early morning reading on die clash today reminds me of the definition: "when opposing dies collide with each other when a planchet fails to be fed into the striking chamber." (emphasis added) http://www.error-ref.com/die_clash/ If a coin evidencing a die clash must show some of what normally appears on one side of the coin on the 'wrong' side, then by definition it can not be the effect of a die clash we see on your coin. If your coin did suffer a die clash then we should see some part of the memorial or the reverse legend on the obverse and not another "6" on the obverse where the date (which contains a 6) should and does appear. I hope that is not clear as mud.
I knew that. The first thing I thought was oh no, the more we magnify a coin the more errors we think we see.
