1944-P "Pierfort Cent" Lincoln Cent - Pollock 2078 Variety!

Discussion in 'What's it Worth' started by huntsman53, Jul 17, 2005.

  1. huntsman53

    huntsman53 Supporter**


    GDJMSP,

    From everything that I have read on the 1944-P "Thick Planchet" Lincoln Cents, the verdict is still out on what they actually are (a cent struck on an experimental planchet, a cent struck on a foreign coin planchet, a matte proof, etc.)! As far as I can determine, no one (to this Date) has proved that these cents were struck on foreign coin planchets and statements to this are only supposition or theory. There were/are no known foreign coin planchets of this thickness used by the U.S. Mints in 1944. Judd was the first to note that these were struck on experimental planchets but later removed the statement from his book. Not being able to prove that these cents were struck on foreign coin planchets and since the Mints' records did not shed any light on why that these thick planchets existed in 1944, Pollock also designated these as being struck on experimental planchets with his number designation of 2078. As most professionals consider these cents rare, they apparently have not even undertaken the task to find out what many of these thick planchets are made of (their' composition).

    If you have or know of any reference material (books, articles, etc.) that prove that these cents were struck on foreign coin planchets, please let me and everyone else know. I am always looking for the truth but until then, I will hold to dreams that my 1944-P Lincoln Cent is one of a very few and very unique coins!


    Frank
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I'm not meaning to imply that the coin isn't rare - it is. And you should be very proud of finding it. But typically an experimental planchet is one made of a new alloy or a new metal altogether. The term normally does not apply to a thicker planchet. That's all I meant. And I think that is why Judd changed his mind also about using the term to describe the coin. Could be wrong on that though.

    I agree - no one can prove either way how the coins came to be. But one of the theories is that it was possibly struck on an Ethiopian 5 centimes planchet.
     
  4. giladzuc

    giladzuc Senior Member

    So, thickness makes the difference...
    Nice find.
     
  5. craton

    craton New Member

    I agree. Too "new" and jagged to be struck thru thread.

    VERY cool find though! I'd be completely stoked if I were you.
     
  6. Jhonn

    Jhonn Team Awesome

    Amazing find! Let us know how the certification goes!
     
  7. huntsman53

    huntsman53 Supporter**


    I never had the coin certified! Shortly after posting this Thread which was started in July 2005, I sold the coin on eBay to a Collector of Piefort Cents for around $135. The Buyer was in agreement about the coin and the Strike Thru Errors and was extremely pleased with the purchase!


    Frank
     
  8. craton

    craton New Member


    Wow, I didn't realize that I dredged this thread up from 2005. :goof:
     
  9. Ardatirion

    Ardatirion Où est mon poisson

    I'm glad you did, I would have missed it completely!
     
  10. huntsman53

    huntsman53 Supporter**


    Yeah, I wish that I could dredge up a few more of the coins! I bought it along with many other Wheat Cents from a Pawn Shop at $0.05 each and there were quite a few other Error Cents in the bunch besides the 1944-P "Thick Planchet" Cent.


    Frank
     
  11. n_sandler4

    n_sandler4 Paul

    Hey guys,



    I don't like having to revive an old thread, but check this out. I found one of these thick planchet 1944 cents as well, raw in an eBay lot of 15 error cents. I sent it to NGC and it was graded MS64RB. :D

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]



    -Paul
     
  12. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    That's a heck of a find! Good for you!
     
  13. Prospector

    Prospector Member

    Dang.. now I have to search through my wheat hoard again.
     
  14. borgovan

    borgovan Supporter**

    Please rename this thread "Lazarus - The Thread That Would Not Die."
     
  15. Ltrain

    Ltrain New Member

    My thoughts precisely... but why did ya bump it? haha.
     
  16. Prospector

    Prospector Member

    I Bumped it... out of curiosity.. sorry, it was a NEED to KNOW basis.
     
  17. 10gary22

    10gary22 Junior Member

    That is totally an AWEsome Find ! I guess I know what I will search for tomorrow ?

    WoW man !

    Congratulations !
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page