1961 D Penny Weight 2.7g

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by babygirl, Mar 23, 2019.

  1. babygirl

    babygirl Member

    Could someone help me with this error? Also some mechanical doubling around the front and the back. WIN_20190323_18_39_14_Pro.jpg WIN_20190323_18_39_34_Pro.jpg WIN_20190323_18_35_59_Pro.jpg WIN_20190323_18_41_01_Pro.jpg WIN_20190323_18_41_18_Pro.jpg WIN_20190323_18_41_43_Pro.jpg Thank you for any help
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    Show us a picture of the edge.
    Mechanical Doubling is not a variety.
    That is considered worthless doubling.
     
  4. babygirl

    babygirl Member

  5. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    2.7 grams means it was probably minted in a rolled thin Planchet. That's a nice find.

    Here are 2 examples from my collection -
    thin1.JPG 2591926-009+.JPG
     
  6. Fallguy

    Fallguy Active Member

    Yes, forget about the MD. The more interesting question is its weight. Assuming your scale is properly calibrated, the 2.7g weight puts it at .28g below the bottom tolerance (3.11g - .13g = 2.98g as the allowed weight at the low end tolerance). While the photos aren't the clearest, your coin doesn't look all that worn, at least to produce that much of a weight loss. Therefore the better question is, why does your coin only weigh 2.7g given the apparent condition of same?

    Semper Fidelis
     
  7. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    I gave the answer in my post..
    Rolled thin Planchet o_O.. With examples.
     
    Stevearino likes this.
  8. babygirl

    babygirl Member

    Thank you so much for this information, is there any value to this coin
     
  9. Fallguy

    Fallguy Active Member

    Sorry my man, completely missed your follow-up or I wouldn't have posted. You gave a much better and thorough response (and yes with examples:):):)) than I did, or could have. BTW, hope you don't think that my post was directed at you; the "Yes, forget about the MD" was intended as an agreement with you and pointing the OP toward a possibly more fruitful aspect of the coin; which of course you were already in the process of defining for the Poster. Certainly did not mean to appear to be stepping on anyone's toes, and my apologies if anything in my post made it appear to the contrary. Semper Fidelis :oops:
     
    paddyman98 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page