Another misattributed Minerva

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Orfew, Mar 5, 2019.

  1. David Atherton

    David Atherton Flavian Fanatic

    The style looks official to me. Nice example with honest wear.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Roman Collector

    Roman Collector Well-Known Member

    Here's a Domitian with Minerva. I have no reason to think it's rare, but what do I know? Maybe the engraver's error on the obverse makes it a rarity. Perhaps one of you Flavian experts can tell me. I think it's cool because you can see the snake heads on Minerva's aegis.

    Domitian Minerva denarius.jpg
    Domitian, AD 81-96.
    Roman AR denarius, 3.44 g, 17.2 mm, 7 h.
    Rome, AD 91.
    Obv: IMP CAES DOMIT AVG GERM P M TR XI (error; should read TR P XI), laureate head, right.
    Rev: IMP XXI COS XV CENS P P P, Minerva advancing right, brandishing a javelin and holding a shield.
    Refs: RIC 156; RIC² 724; BMCRE p. 336, note; Cohen 269; RCV --.
     
  4. Orfew

    Orfew Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus

    There is no note in RIC that mentions this error.I like the coin and in my opinion the error makes the coin more interesting.
     
    Roman Collector likes this.
  5. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    Another question:
    If Flavian rarities based on dating numbers (not things like the Colosseum sestertii) appear in a widely distributed sale (CNG level) but the description does not explain the rarity, how do the bids compare to exceptionally nice but common coins of the same type but with more common numbers? In Severan, I see really rare numbers selling for very little more while grade means a great deal more. That may be a sign of the relatively fewer people collecting the series. The Severan things that stand out as different to everyone always sell well but I have bought rare minor variations for little or no more than the similar common coin but know I have no chance whatsoever for things like the arch even though the CNG site shows them having sold six of them.
    https://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=175854
    [​IMG]

    In that same time CNG has sold fewer than six Emesa Minerva coins (all scarce) and none with an owl (unless I missed it). I paid $80 (to someone you know) for this one and have seen none since (Martin may have one???). Does rarity matter? Is that different in Flavians?
    rg2170bb1736.jpg
     
    dadams, Bing, randygeki and 1 other person like this.
  6. Ken Dorney

    Ken Dorney Yea, I'm Cool That Way...

    Very simple. Many will tell you it takes two to drive up the price of a coin, but often it will take three or more bidders. Overall Domitian denarii with Minerva reverses are incredibly common. True some varieties (dates) are very rare, but it will take two people to care about the date to drive up a price. But what happens when both bidders are what some may call 'cheapskates'? The price stays low. Some day Domitian denarii may become supremely sought after, but who can tell?
     
    dadams likes this.
  7. Sulla80

    Sulla80 Well-Known Member

    Here's an AE denarius of Domitian which I don't think matches any official issue in RSC: e.g. RSC 234 would have obverse legend doesn't match (should be Na "VII" 87-88 AD) - 242b would be IMP XV 88-89 AD) no match OCRE either - any correction to my read is appreciated - also interested to know if a more specific date can be defined.

    Domitian AE Denarius

    Domitianus 88.jpg
    Obv: IMP CAES DOMIT AVG GERM PM TRP VIII, laureate head right
    Rev: IMP XIIII COS XIIII CENS P P P Minerva standing left, holding thunderbolt and spear, shield at her side
    Size: 1.62g, 17.3-18.0mm
    Date: 88 AD?
    Note: Edit (AD not BC)
     
    Last edited: Mar 5, 2019
    Johndakerftw, dadams, Bing and 3 others like this.
  8. ominus1

    ominus1 Well-Known Member

    ...AD?
     
    Sulla80 likes this.
  9. Orfew

    Orfew Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus

    A few questions. 1. Are you sure about the weight? 2. Are you sure this is AE and not silver?
    3.The legends correspond to RIC 580- a denarius. I also read TR P VII and not TR P VIII. Are you sure it reads TR P VIII?
     
    Sulla80 likes this.
  10. Sulla80

    Sulla80 Well-Known Member

    I must have republic on the brain, Yes : AD

    1) yes just rechecked weight 1.62g
    2) not 100% on AR vs. AE very green patina "limes" was my assumption
    3) I see a VIII - but could be an odd end to bust?
    WIN_20190305_21_42_52_Pro.jpg
     
    ominus1 and randygeki like this.
  11. David Atherton

    David Atherton Flavian Fanatic

    Doug, your experience with Severan coins at auction pretty much corresponds with Flavian as well. Most folks don't care about a rare date on a common type (Domitian Minervas for example), but rare types are fairly hot. There is no comparison between Domitian's 'R2' Minervas and his 'R2' temple reverse denarii.
     
  12. David Atherton

    David Atherton Flavian Fanatic

    It indeed is a 'limes' denarius. The style isn't official and neither is the metal or weight! Very nice, BTW.
     
    Sulla80 likes this.
  13. Jay GT4

    Jay GT4 Well-Known Member

    Between here and Forum I know at least 5 people who care about and actively collect Domitian's Imperial acclimations. Some are scarce, others very rare. While it's always nice to get a rarity, I think condition usually wins out, unless there's no chance of getting another anytime soon...like a winged Minerva TRP XVI :)
     
  14. David Atherton

    David Atherton Flavian Fanatic

    Touché!
     
    Jay GT4 likes this.
  15. David Atherton

    David Atherton Flavian Fanatic

    Mistakes like that don't happen very often on Domitian's official coins. Needless to say that's a wonderful piece!
     
    Roman Collector likes this.
  16. randygeki

    randygeki Coin Collector

    Nice!

    Wait till I run out of horseman coins. :D

    12_012.JPG
     
    Johndakerftw, ominus1, Bing and 5 others like this.
  17. Jay GT4

    Jay GT4 Well-Known Member

    randygeki and Orfew like this.
  18. Aethelred

    Aethelred The Old Dead King

    This is a very thought provoking thread to me. So far I've been a Roman "type collector," but I've wondered if I want to have an area to specialize in in addition to collecting by type. @Orfew and his interest in Flavian coinage has been a big inspiration in making me think I might want to "settle down" with one emperor or type. I'm not sure what I would specialize in yet, I assume it will come naturally, so I'm not going to try to force it.
     
    dadams likes this.
  19. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    IMO these are two important suggestions from your own words. Don't give up your old hobby to start over as a specialist. The two can exist side by side and you should not sell off coins you like just because you decided now you are a specialist in something else.

    If you are a general collector with, say, 100 coins, you might just look at those coins and see what they have in common. If, for example, you have ten Flavians and only two Antonines, your collection may be telling you something. Specialties do not have to be time periods. Errors, women, quinarii, gold.....all have fans here. There are hundreds of possible specialties. One of the older sale catalogs I have was a collection of cows on coins.....not a pig in the bunch.
     
  20. dadams

    dadams Well-Known Member

    I was reading the titles from your larger image but I agree "the letters all run together" - I had to get glasses last year and I guess it was for a reason. Nice catch.
     
  21. Orfew

    Orfew Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus



    I agree. You can do both. This hobby is wonderful. It can take you in many directions at once...let it. I am still a 12 Caesars collector at heart. I might spend some time with the Flavians and may even specialize in this area but this does not mean that I am not a 12 Caesars collector. Pick up a few coins of your favorite emperor and find out if you have a passion for it. You can however have more than one passion at the same time.
     
    Jay GT4 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page