1832 Cohen-1 Half Cent Observation

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by TexasJarhead, Mar 5, 2019.

  1. TexasJarhead

    TexasJarhead Junior Member

    Below are pictures of my 1832 C-1 Half Cent. It has all of the attributes of a C-1 variety and ANACS verified it is a C-1 variety. However, after getting some quality pictures taken, I observed that the "N" in "Cent" appears to be re-cut. This particular reverse die was the same reverse die used for 1831. I've checked Mr. Roger Cohen's "Little Half Sisters" book, and neither the description for the 1832 C-1 or 1831 C-1 variety mentions this anomaly with the "N". I would think that this would be an obvious die characteristic that would have been highlighted for this particular reverse die. Any thoughts? 1832-Half-Cent-C-1-ANACS-EF-45-Details Obverse.jpg 1832-Half-Cent-C-1-ANACS-EF-45-Details Reverse.jpg 1832-Half-Cent-C-1-ANACS-EF-45-Details Recut N.jpg
     
    NSP, Evan8, JCKTJK and 1 other person like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Lawtoad

    Lawtoad Well-Known Member

    Eduard likes this.
  4. TexasJarhead

    TexasJarhead Junior Member

    Great, thanks. The pictures in the The Little Sisters book are pretty small so couldn't see it. Still curious why it wasn't mentioned in the textual description of the die. Appreciate the link.
     
  5. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    Maybe they didn't look at the part of coin that much. I know when I was collecting these coins back in the late 1980s and early '90s, I was always looking at the tips of the wreath and "United States of America."
     
    TexasJarhead likes this.
  6. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

  7. TexasJarhead

    TexasJarhead Junior Member

    Thanks for the link. That's actually an amazing site.
     
    Rick Stachowski likes this.
  8. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    Breen doesn't mention the recut N either. It seems everyone is hung up on the "Accessory E" punched in the wreath below the E in STATES instead. I wonder if Gilbert mentioned the recutting since his book came out before the Accessory E was discovered.

    I also notice you didn't mention the fact that the T in CENT is recut as well but not as obviously. This is also not described in the standard references.
     
    Eduard likes this.
  9. TexasJarhead

    TexasJarhead Junior Member

    I didn't notice that the "T" had been recut as well. Good catch, thanks.
     
  10. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    Oh and although not mentioned in Breen his book has large clear pictures and the recutting clearly shows in them.
     
  11. Evan8

    Evan8 A Little Off Center

    My 1832 is also Cohen 1. Shows the same N. I always thought it was a form of doubling.
    Comb25032017082857.jpg
     
    TexasJarhead likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page