GTG: Toned 1941 Walker

guess the grade....any opinions on the toning?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Looks something lower AU to me

 

+1. Re the toning: I find it very unattractive and would not offer AU money for it. Just my opinion.

Steve

 

Ditto. I don't care for toned coins at all; YMMV.

 

XF-AU

 

AU-53

 

XF-40

 

XF45

 

AU50.
Not what I would typically consider attractive toning, but nicely toned walkers are few.... and the colors are interesting, OK coin to me.

 

XF 45. The toning is very unattractive.

 

Im gonna go out on a far limb and say MS-62. That's not my grade, just what I think the slab says.

 

Need a better picture. As far as the toning, not very eye appealing.

 

sorry about the pic, I don't have the coin in hand...

….and so far, no one has picked the grade yet

 

Looks to be a PCGS rattler holder.
I’ll go MS 64.

I’m not a fan of the toning, but I could see someone liking it.

 

There is absolutely no way to accurately grade from these images. The toning is leaning slightly toward a negative eye appeal for me but as already mentioned, it is a least interesting...

 

Slightly? The coin is hideous.

 

yeah, the colors are a bit mottled and variegated, it isn't gorgeous, but I'd hardly consider it 'hideous'

it's not a Sunnywood toner, but for a Walker, at least it has some brighter shades....

this is hideous toning:

 

I would put the OP’s coin in the same group—hideous toning, that actually has a negative premium on value of the coin.

 

Au 58. Weakly struck and I find it less than appealing

 

IMO the MS 64 looks a lot nicer than the 65.