NGC Proof-Like Designation: Would this 1977-D Ike Dollar Have a Chance?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Ike Skywalker, Feb 1, 2019.

  1. Ike Skywalker

    Ike Skywalker Well-Known Member

    I would very much appreciate your opinions on this '77-D Eisenhower Dollar, and whether or not it would have a chance at getting a PL designation from NGC. This coin is blindingly reflective like an actual proof Ike, though there is no cameo contrast. It has a liquid metal appearance like nickels from the special mint sets of '65-'67. I have taken multiple shots at different angles for thorough review. Thanks.

    77-D PL.jpg

    The green color in these shots were from my computer screen:

    IMG_0652.JPG

    IMG_0654.JPG

    IMG_0662.JPG

    IMG_0660.JPG

    "mirror" shots:

    IMG_0480.JPG

    IMG_0481.JPG
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    No, I don’t think it would be designated “prooflike.” It is a nice, high-grade very reflective Ike. The PL designation is not that common, and I say no. It would grade high, though.
     
    Ike Skywalker likes this.
  4. CoinBlazer

    CoinBlazer Numismatic Enthusiast

    I really think that cameo contrast is very important to a PL designation
     
    Morgandude11 and Ike Skywalker like this.
  5. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    I wouldn't spend the money to submit it by itself, but the virtual absence of circumferential luster leads me to recommend that you try next time you have other coins you are sending in anyway.
     
  6. LaCointessa

    LaCointessa Well-Known Member

  7. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    LaCointessa likes this.
  8. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    No. Cameo contrast has absolutely nothing to do with the PL designation. PL is based solely on the depth of reflectivity of the fields. The fact that some DMPL Morgans coincidentally also have a nice cameo effect is irrelevant - the designation is based on the mirrored fields.

    This Ike has one of the best chances of any Ike I've seen, but I honestly don't know. PL Ikes are very rare, because the fields are so wide open. The entire field has to be reflective, and often times areas are reflective and parts aren't. For example, I'm seeing areas on the reverse of your coin that make me think this one may not get it - but overall the coin is quite convincing.

    I realize that doesn't answer your question at all, but if the coin were mine I would send it in.
     
    JPeace$, Ike Skywalker, Evan8 and 4 others like this.
  9. LaCointessa

    LaCointessa Well-Known Member


    Thanks. I have only JUST begun to read on the subject of cameo contrasts and proofs because of what Paddyman showed in another thread. I'll keep studying. Thank you, also @Morgandude11
     
    JPeace$ and Morgandude11 like this.
  10. CoinBlazer

    CoinBlazer Numismatic Enthusiast

    Understood...
     
  11. Jaelus

    Jaelus The Hungarian Antiquarian Supporter

    Beat me to it. Reflectivity and cameo often go hand in hand, however, cameo is not required for the designation. I even have slabbed coins with the DPL (deep prooflike) designation that have absolutely no cameo.
     
    Ike Skywalker likes this.
  12. Evan8

    Evan8 A Little Off Center

    I think this Ike has a great shot at it. But you never know.

    Here's my PL quarter to help show that cameo doesn't matter. This coin is like a piece of chrome
    2016-08-13-14-16-48.jpg
    2016-08-13-14-30-07.jpg
     
    LaCointessa and Ike Skywalker like this.
  13. iontyre

    iontyre Active Member

    Evan8: Did that quarter come from a mint set? Some of mine that I pulled from mint sets look similar.
     
  14. Evan8

    Evan8 A Little Off Center

    I bought it already slabbed. I wouldnt be surprised though if it did come from a mint set.
     
  15. EyeAppealingCoins

    EyeAppealingCoins Well-Known Member

    Based on the first five images, I would say no. Based on the last two, I would say a PL or star isn't out of the question, and I would throw in a modern submission or economy submission if you have one going in. If it does PL, then the coin is worth a handsome premium.
     
    Ike Skywalker likes this.
  16. Ike Skywalker

    Ike Skywalker Well-Known Member

    Thanks for all the replies. The two images with the near-black background were taken with the coin under the harsh direct light of 5 Jansjo lamps. I couldn’t even see the coin. It was just a bright white circle with no detail until I tapped to focus. The iPhone then adjusted accordingly. I did this to show the surfaces without luster/reflectivity, or as “flat” as possible.

    So, is it the case that reviewing a coin for PL reflectivity isn’t something you can request? You just have to hope that it is strong enough that they notice it while it’s being graded, correct?
     
    Evan8 likes this.
  17. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Yes, that is correct. However, if they don't catch it the first time you can send it back for "Designation Review," and request that they specifically look for the PL. I've had a few upgrade this way.
     
    LaCointessa and Ike Skywalker like this.
  18. Ike Skywalker

    Ike Skywalker Well-Known Member

  19. JPeace$

    JPeace$ Coinaholic

    Very nice Ike! I sure hope you get PL. It certainly has some merit based on the pictures you've posted. Good luck with it.
     
    Ike Skywalker likes this.
  20. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    If you do submit it, and you do get the PL.... let me know.

    If you don't want to submit it.... let me know.
     
  21. Ike Skywalker

    Ike Skywalker Well-Known Member

    I’ll let you know either way. Thanks.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page