Regular Strike vs. Proof

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Bonedigger, Jan 29, 2008.

  1. Bonedigger

    Bonedigger New Member

    Which series of US Coins have examples more valuable as Regular Strickes instead of Proofs. "Whaaaat you say..." They are there and yes coins of the same date too...

    Take Care
    Ben
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Aberlight

    Aberlight New Member

    Are you referring to modern coinage?
     
  4. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    Ben:
    Among others:
    Most Barber coins (dimes, quarters and half dollars) are more common in proof than unc.
     
  5. Bonedigger

    Bonedigger New Member


    Heck, I don't know :);):) It doesn't matter, Coinage...
     
  6. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    Also, some modern commems are scarcer in unc than proofs.
     
  7. Bonedigger

    Bonedigger New Member

    Now, before you start posting Silver, Platinum, and Gold (NCLT or Medal-Coins as Aidan used to call them, LOL...) that's not really what I was talking about. I'm talking about coins which might have been or could be found in a grocery store cash register...

    Take Care
    Ben
     
  8. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    Back to the Barbers then.
     
  9. alcochaser

    alcochaser Large Clad Dollar Nut

    An obvious one is the 1895 Morgan dollar minted at Philadelphia. The circulation strikes all went into the melting pot. Leaving the proof coins the only examples of 1895 Phila coins.

    Other examples would probably circulation strikes that are mint set only.

    Such as 1970 half. 1987 Half, 2002 and up Half. and the 2002 and up Sac dollar.
     
  10. Bonedigger

    Bonedigger New Member

    I was thinking about some of the Seated Liberty Halves. A couple of years ago Cave Troll had one he either was selling or contemplating buying (can't remember which) and was trying to figure out if it was Pr or not, hoping for the best.

    Ben
     
  11. Hobo

    Hobo Squirrel Hater

    Off the top of my head I can think of a few:

    1877 Indian Head Cent

    1879 & 1880 Shield Nickels
     
  12. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    That is simply not true, at least judging by numbers of coins certified by TPGs and looking at the series as a whole. Check the pop reports if you don't believe me, but mint state UNC barber coinage outnumber proofs by a large margin.
     
  13. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    p.s. that said, the only one that comes to my mind (other than some modern commems) is 3CNs from 1883 to 1889.
     
  14. The_Cave_Troll

    The_Cave_Troll The Coin Troll

    Some of the seated dollar dates are more rare in MS than in PF
    The 79 and 80 Shield nickels
    the 85 and 86 V nickels
    1901 Morgans are better in MS than in PF in the unc range
     
  15. The_Cave_Troll

    The_Cave_Troll The Coin Troll

    The coin you are remembering is a seated half in the 1880's. All of those dates are scarce in Unc (when compared to the other dates in the series), but common as far as seated half proofs go, though I think in absolute rareity they are similar, for the most part. I suppose in 65+ the proofs are more common.
     
  16. Aslanmia

    Aslanmia Active Member

    I'm probably way off base here, but...

    I have a few proof sets from 1961 and 1964. Seems like most of the business strike versions are worth more then the proofs in higher grades for most of the denominations.

    I just assumed it was because it was harder to find the business strikes in higher grades, yes?
     
  17. The_Cave_Troll

    The_Cave_Troll The Coin Troll

    yes, you are correct
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page