Is this the real 1971d error quarter

I think it's the real deal? I'm new please help

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

No. Read this: https://www.coinworld.com/news/us-coins/2017/01/orphaned-washington-pair-is-a-real-mystery.all.html

 

You need to tell us what is it you see different that makes you think its a Mint Error.. I don't see anything

Just Environmental Damage and circulation wear.

 

So it's just worth face value??

 

Put another way: There are some REALLY smart people on this site. Some complete wastes of space, too, but I digress.

Thing is, there are almost NO mind readers. No one here can possibly imagine what on earth you're referring to.

 

All coins are worth their face value.
No major mint errors.. No premium.

 

The u and the n look looks wider than normal which makes the word look sorta smashed together

 

Okay, NOW we're getting somewhere!

Would it amaze you to know that I have been a SERIOUS collector for over 55 years and this is the VERY FIRST TIME I'm hearing about this? This hobby is only SLIGHTLY about errors and varieties.

 

Oh and by the way I get the fact that I was shy on info but there isn't any point in being a [edited- violation of Rule 1 - consider yourself warned].

 

Yeah, that's going to endear you to everyone.

 

Oh sure there is! Entertainment alone explains it!

 

Wow that's a long time! Ive always been one to pick up any change I find but never really looked into like that. But now that I have I guess you could say I've got the "FEVER" and jus want to learn as much as I can about. This is literally my first forum

 

Damn!! Lol! You got me there!!

 

Leave President Nixon out of this.

 

We'll be gentle. [I have a truly sick sense of humor. You'll get used to it.]

 

Problem is, there is a prominent poster that responded to him in a very aggressive and offputting way. Joey is absolutely right to call him out on it.

 

Well I do too! I thought I picked up on that. Which is why answered back so bluntly

 

You were right to call him out on it. The mods here are pretty strict on language, though.

Put it this way, if you wouldn't hear it on The Brady Bunch, probably shouldn't say it here.

 

One thread bleeding into another in the first paragraph. The second is his typical treatment of newer people on this site without his level of knowledge.